Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.190.58.199; envelope-from=plumberben@yahoo.com
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=a1M6lKq3COwE3dIeCR0DTGrNu7oYXSOXKpS/OYCGxHHaTbI3o9iIKKbwTXXUOvKj2+aVlXQd7J5l++LnEQxFcpSHLjjqP3xadP61rnZVwEwZdgOgJdb/k8PAuHkce4w4ZzH2lplIwTNfFFddnrvVh+uxXgYY6WPdyI9ZyS6d2tk=;
Message-ID: <816317.53598.qm@web55405.mail.re4.yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 05:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ben Schneider <plumberben@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: T-shirt design
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-3798867@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Todd and all,=0A=0A    I am really leaning toward the rotor with the straig=
ht wings. The far upswept wings give me an 80's Aerosmith feel. While proba=
bly one of the more influential bands of the era, not really what I think w=
e want to say.=0AThe AOAP wings are close, but I think they are very much a=
ssociated with AOPA, and not very generic. I think something like the milit=
ary style (straight out) wings on the rotor would be cool. Besides, as U.S.=
 taxpayers, we own the military wings design anyway. (George and Todd, we w=
ill let you in on a technical;) Perhaps even enlarge the rotor a bit to mak=
e it stand out more. As far as the words, I like the idea of Flyrotary.com,=
 BUT do we want to make this about the list, or about rotary powered aircra=
ft. As much as I am loyal to this list, I doubt wether we should alienate o=
thers the way they have us. (kind of a "do unto others" type of thing) The =
beauty of this list is the different ideas and opinions, and open forum for=
 just that. Hate to segregate ourselves for a little advertising. Perhaps w=
hen asked you could recommend flyrotary.com instead of printing it on the s=
hirt. =0A=0AMy 2 cents, and probably not a bargain at that price.=0A=0ABen=
=0A=0A--- On Sat, 8/8/09, Todd Bartrim <bartrim@gmail.com> wrote:=0A=0A> Fr=
om: Todd Bartrim <bartrim@gmail.com>=0A> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: T-shirt d=
esign=0A> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>=0A>=
 Date: Saturday, August 8, 2009, 2:59 AM=0A> =0A> =0A> =0A>   =0A>   =0A> =
=0A>  =0A> =A0=A0=A0 Just back from a loong working vacation=0A> and catchi=
ng up on the list.=0A> =0A> While there has been an excess of t-shirt posts=
.... I'd=0A> like to have one! But from viewing all the ideas put forth=0A>=
 so far...=0A> =0A> I agree that the best choice for wings style is somethi=
ng=0A> that is recognized by most for it's association with=0A> aviation.=
=A0 As I'm typing I thought of AOPA so I=0A> just checked out their logo. K=
inda looks like a rotor in=0A> there doesn't it?=0A> =0A> Their wings are a=
 little too downswept, while too upswept=0A> is just too Harley. The straig=
ht or slightly upswept wings=0A> with a slight hint of military feel to it =
would look best=0A> IMO.=0A> =0A> =A0=A0=A0 As far as adding words... keep =
it simple=0A> and clear. I like a simple FlyRotary.=0A> Written as one word=
. Not only does it say everything it=0A> needs too, it is also a testament =
to this very list that has=0A> brought us all together to share the ideas t=
hat ultimatly=0A> lead to our successes. I suppose it could be FlyRotary.co=
m =0A> =0A> =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 I also like the=0A> idea of a large image=
 on the back of the shirt and a small=0A> image on the front breast (not sm=
all breast).=0A> =0A> =0A> =0A> Todd=0A