Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #46554
From: George Lendich <lendich@aanet.com.au>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Duty Cycle for Injectors
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 07:51:31 +1000
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Gary,
It is interesting that the Bendix system was/is a reasonably high pressure system.
I have been reading about the progressive development of injection system and find it very interesting.
 
Quite obviously you have the knowledge and now that I have your ear, I am eager to learn more about your low pressure systems.
 
Personally I would like to have a low pressure mechanical system.  I was reading about one such system that had a 'spoon like' fuel actuation injection device . I may be reading more into it than there is, however it sounds, to me, like a small airfoil within the inlet manifold, whereby the air speed and density had a direct effect upon the actuation of the metered fuel - purely mechanical. To me that sounds ideal for light aircraft application. My preference in no way 'poo-poos' computerized fuel management systems or direct injection, rather I see it as the poor mans simplified system. I still see the need for an O2 sensor for monitoring a manual leaning facility.
George (down under)
George,
Well, there are "low pressure systems" and "low pressure systems".  Depends on the point of view, I guess.  We're not talking about high pressure direct injection (GDI) systems that are now all the rage.  The original Bendix system ran at 39 psi - a little higher than the Bosch systems at the time,which were, I think 29 psi (exactly 2 bar - a coincidence?) systems.  The reason was that one of our applications was the Cadillac V8 and the injectors were in a hotter location.  The higher pressure was to keep vapor formation at bay during a hot soak.  Then some turbo Chrysler applications used 60 psi for the same reason.  The injector design was the same and most injectors will still open at pressures up to about 100 psi.  There were some lower pressure systems (about 20 psi, I think) that used clever injector designs to reduce sensitivity to vapor formation.  Well, I thought they were clever because some were mine.  Higher pressure operation can improve atomization, but that isn't a big consideration.  Lower pressure systems once allowed a lower cost fuel pump to be used, but that isn't true any more.  No, I don't think lower pressure systems are coming back.
 
None of this discussion pertains to the "Bendix" aircraft injection system, which is a totally different concept.
Gary




-----Inline Message Follows-----

Cary,
Very interesting, thank you for that info.
Bendix is a low pressure injector system is it not?
I have been reading about the benefits of low pressure systems - are they coming back in vogue?
George ( down under)
 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster