X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from poplet2.per.eftel.com ([203.24.100.45] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTP id 3636655 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 08 May 2009 19:52:28 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=203.24.100.45; envelope-from=lendich@aanet.com.au Received: from mail.aanet.com.au (mail.aanet.com.au [203.24.100.34]) by poplet2.per.eftel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1641738D3 for ; Sat, 9 May 2009 07:51:43 +0800 (WST) Received: from ownerf1fc517b8 (203.171.92.134.static.rev.aanet.com.au [203.171.92.134]) by mail.aanet.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A17A149C21F for ; Sat, 9 May 2009 07:51:11 +0800 (WST) Message-ID: From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Pulses Per Rev and the TACH: [FlyRotary] Re: John Downings Tach Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:51:13 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean > Hi Ed, > > "if you are just > tapping one spark plug you would get 1 spark per 360 deg." > > I'm not quite convinced of that. Every piston fires once every 720 > deg. Compression/(fire plug)/power stroke is 360, then > exhaust/intake is a second 360. If I sample one plug I will see one > spark for 720. From Jeff's explanation, the tach mentioned samples > two spark plug wires for a 4 cylinder 4 stroke (although I think this > is 1 pulse per 360 rather than 2). For a two stroke, only one plug is > sampled, so still 1 pulse per 360. At least I think that's what I > understood Jeff to be saying. On a 4/4 engine, the tach's that work > with a coil and distributor will see two pulses per 360 as two > cylinders will fire in one 360 and the other two in the next 360. > > If I still have this wrong, then I need more help! :) > > Bob W. Bob, Don't we all! George (down under)