Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #46056
From: Jeff Whaley <jwhaley@datacast.com>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] lines
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 11:07:57 -0700
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

It’s not the security of the connectors I worry about; it is the quality of the flare on the tube, mating to the flared AN connector and all the mass of fluid and tube is absorbed at the compression joint … the same is true for flexible hoses but they won’t metal-fatigue and fail outright.

I use rigid soft aluminum 3/8” for fuel lines in the gravity-feed portion of the fuel system; they are not pressurized; they are secured in multiple locations and tank to airframe uses a rubber hose. I find the flares are easy to do, but finicky to make leak-proof …   Jeff

 

From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of n3773@comcast.net
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 1:33 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] lines

 

i thought that the rigid lines were more secure on the ends than flex, which is why the C/S prop governor uses rigid for the 600(?)psi line to the prop.  mid-span support(s) is usually simple.  does the rotary oil pulse pressure dictate a steel line?             kevin   [years ago when i made up braided oil cooler lines for my O-320 we used corps of engineers test equipment- could test in excess of 100,000psi, not that we tried it !!!]

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster