Received-SPF: neutral
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.33.127.81; envelope-from=rotary@cmowens.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
In-Reply-To: <list-3596629@logan.com>
References: <list-3596629@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <2100B63C-5A26-4CE2-8DB9-BD9B46E62ACA@cmowens.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Christopher Owens <rotary@cmowens.com>
Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW:  [FlyRotary] Re: Exhaust system wall thickness
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:49:52 -0500
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Thanks Bobby.  The Renesis is the engine that's highest on my list of  
consideration, to be sure.   I have yet to acquire one, however.   
I'll certainly keep the stock exhaust manifold in mind, though.

Fact gathering at the moment, so that when the time comes, I'll be  
prepared.

Best regards,
Chris

On Apr 25, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Bobby J. Hughes wrote:

> Chris,
>
> If I remember correctly you have a Renesis. If so, the stock manifold
> can easily be cut down and used. It's a little heavy but you don't  
> have
> to worry about it holding up. I may try a lighter manifold in the
> future. But for now it's one less thing to worry about during the  
> first
> 100 hrs. The stock manifold can be had for under $100 but may take  
> some
> looking. It also has a good heat shield that can be partly used. At
> least three folks on this list have taken this approach.
>
> Here's one on Ebay with no reserve and no bids.
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/RX8-Exhaust-Manifold-and-O2-sensor- 
> No-Res
> erve_W0QQitemZ230338894473QQcmdZViewItemQQimsxZ20090423? 
> IMSfp=TL09042314
> 10006r30271
>
>
> Bobby Hughes