Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #4573
From: sqpilot@earthlink <sqpilot@earthlink.net>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: More wacky water pump plans
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 14:07:24 -0500
To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 11:04 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: More wacky water pump plans

Brilliant Rusty - except that if you loose the belts you wont have much juice left for the EWP. 
 
The life expectancy (engine and pilot) is far longer without an alternator, than without water flow :-) 
 
Seriously, I think the advantage of the EWP might be removal of the mechanical pump load and weight. If I were going with EWP I'd get two and loose the mechanical pump. Go with a standard rad - it'll save you about the cost of the second EWP, plus less load on the belts to keep you're alternator running. 
 
I already have two EWP's, and running both, with no mechanical pump is still an option.   Unfortunately, packaging is still an issue.  Remember, skinny metal, not fat plastic :-) 
 
Rusty (I hope I get the chance to critique your work <g>)
 
Hi, Rusty....regarding the skinny metal, I assume you are referring to the EWP. Do you have the Meziere pumps?  It does sound logical to go with the two EWP's and dump the mechanical pump. Save weight , have redundancy, and not rob precious horsepower from the engine. Just a thought from someone who hasn't done it yet, so consider the source.  I do like the adapter plate that Meziere has for the rotary engine.  Did I say I like bolt-ons?   Take care.  Paul Conner
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster