Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.65] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2780146 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:04:52 -0500 Received: from rad ([68.212.0.112]) by imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20031202050444.JUCK1909.imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rad> for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 00:04:44 -0500 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: More wacky water pump plans Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 23:04:46 -0600 Message-ID: <001201c3b891$ce33dd20$6001a8c0@rad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0013_01C3B85F.83996D20" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C3B85F.83996D20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brilliant Rusty - except that if you loose the belts you wont have much juice left for the EWP.=20 =20 The life expectancy (engine and pilot) is far longer without an = alternator, than without water flow :-)=20 =20 Seriously, I think the advantage of the EWP might be removal of the mechanical pump load and weight. If I were going with EWP I'd get two = and loose the mechanical pump. Go with a standard rad - it'll save you about = the cost of the second EWP, plus less load on the belts to keep you're alternator running.=20 =20 I already have two EWP's, and running both, with no mechanical pump is = still an option. Unfortunately, packaging is still an issue. Remember, = skinny metal, not fat plastic :-)=20 =20 Rusty (I hope I get the chance to critique your work ) =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C3B85F.83996D20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Brilliant=20 Rusty - except that if you loose the belts you wont have much juice=20 left for the EWP. 
 
The life = expectancy (engine=20 and pilot) is far longer without an alternator, than without water = flow=20 :-) 
 
Seriously, I=20 think the advantage of the EWP might be removal of the mechanical pump = load and=20 weight. If I were going with EWP I'd get two and loose the mechanical = pump. Go=20 with a standard rad - it'll save you about the cost of the = second EWP, plus=20 less load on the belts to keep you're alternator running. 
 
I already have = two EWP's,=20 and running both, with no mechanical pump is still=20 an option.   Unfortunately, packaging is still an issue.  Remember, = skinny metal,=20 not fat plastic :-) 
 
Rusty (I hope I get the chance to = critique your=20 work <g>)
 
------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C3B85F.83996D20--