X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 5.2.12) with PIPE id 3498074; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:41:05 -0500 X-WinmailDat: 1 attachments extracted. X-ExtScanner: Niversoft's Winmail.dat filter Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.123] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.12) with ESMTP id 3498082 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:40:27 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=75.180.132.123; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from computername ([75.191.186.236]) by cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090218003944.KXMW21761.cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com@computername> for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:39:44 +0000 From: "Ed Anderson" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: hauling gas Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:39:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0021_01C99137.7C904BF0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcmRW3Ui1Wba7mWST9y4SqMeU5y3ywAAoIfQ X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 00000000DC6625E6AA8BEC4FA6C322F06EACA27784C66000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Message-Id: <20090218003944.KXMW21761.cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com@computername> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0021_01C99137.7C904BF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chief, I, for one, have never attempted to use a volt ohm meter to measure static charge. However, I do not believe using the typical Volt ohm meter would prove or disprove a charge existed. The moment you touched the probe and completed a circuit to ground any static build up would likely be dissipated in one very quick burst or the current would be too low to register. So it would probably take something sophisticated like the gold leaf in a vacuum jar indicator or something more advanced. Perhaps grounding oneself and slowing bring a finger closer to the vehicle metal frame might reveal static electricity if a sufficiently high charge had accumulated. But, since I have not tried a volt ohm meter, perhaps someone would conduct that experiment and give us a report - but preferably not during a refueling {:>) Regarding the automobile, I suspect that the hose and nozzle are well grounded at the pump end. Since most people do not start pumping gas until after the nozzle is in the tank opening, it is likely that if there is any static charge on the car that it is then grounded through the tank opening, nozzle and hose before gasoline starts to flow. Now a gas can on the plastic liner of a truck bed may be fairly well insulated from the steel body of the truck. So any static charge that may have accumulated from air flow over the can while the truck was traveling may be slow to "leak" off. Therefore a higher likelihood of a potential spark between gas can and nozzle than say between nozzle and gas tank opening. Therefore the requirement to place the container on the ground. At least, that is the way I see it. However, I can tell you from personal experience - having had to deal with a very memorable refueling fire - that either static electricity exists under those conditions OR there are invisible gremlins out there who should not be trusted with matches {:>). Best Regards Ed Ed Anderson Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com http://www.andersonee.com http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html http://www.flyrotary.com/ http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of SHIPCHIEF@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 6:56 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: hauling gas That's an interesting antecdotal story, and I believe it's true. And a cracking tower would be a lot more likely to have fuel vapor around due to the scale and nature of the operation. But the question remains, in our application, has anyone EVER put a meter between the aircraft and the fuel nozzle to see if any static voltage exists? Why is it not required for cars? Is there any significant difference? They are both grounded thru the carbon black in the tires? I'm not advocating unsafe operation here; I just want the facts so I know where the potential danger is really coming from, not some armchair monday morning quaterback, look over your shoulder whiner's dictum, like not allowing you to fuel your own car in Oregon. Oregonians look just as smart as anyone else to me? ************** A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1218822736x1201267884/aol?redir=htt p://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=feb emailfooterNO62) ------=_NextPart_000_0021_01C99137.7C904BF0--