X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.121] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.12) with ESMTP id 3496335 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:19:05 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=75.180.132.121; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from computername ([75.191.186.236]) by cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090217001829.DALL4162.cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com@computername>; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:18:29 +0000 From: "Ed Anderson" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Cc: "'Charlie England'" Subject: Chuck Dunlap? [FlyRotary] Re: Second flight Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:18:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcmQZdssry9IPv9gSpu1JSXvr8veCQALy0XA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Message-Id: <20090217001829.DALL4162.cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com@computername> Hi Charlie, you caught my attention when you mentioned buying an RV-6 from Chuck Dunlap - has Chuck build a second rotary powered aircraft? Have not heard from/about him since he failed to make it cross Texas to the Pecan Plantation flyin - you remember that joyful flight do you not?? Ed Ed Anderson Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com http://www.andersonee.com http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html http://www.flyrotary.com/ http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Charlie England Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 1:39 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Second flight Mike Wills wrote: >snipped> > Other impressions. The airplane is loud, but not painfully so. At > least not from the pilot's seat. The handling and control power still > seem quite a bit better than my RV-6A (which was great). Not really > clear why but most of my flying in the -6A I had someone in the right > seat so maybe the weight? Other than the rudder, the airplane flies > perfectly straight. > > All things considered I'm real happy. This flight was considerably > less stressful than the first and I actually was able to enjoy it. I > honestly dont remember a lot of the first flight. Also, I took my > glider data logger with me on this flight. I havent downloaded it yet, > but when I do I'll know more about speeds, climb rate, etc. > > Dont know how you guys feel about these flight reports. Give me some > feedback if you want more as my testing progresses. I know that I like > reading about other's flight experiences as it motivated me to keep > going. After 13 years of building I'll tell you, its worth it. Now I > wish I'd pressed harder to get it done sooner. > > Next flight will have to wait until I get gear leg stiffeners added. > Classic RV - pretty bad shimmy on the roll out after landing. 38.5 > hours to go! > > Mike Wills > RV-4 N144MW Hi Mike, Keep 'em coming; that's how I learn. RV handling: As nice as the -6's handling is, it's nothing compared to a -4 (I'm currently flying my 2nd one, purchased from Chuck Dunlap). I've heard that the -3 is even better than the -4; if anyone wants to let me fly one to find out for myself, just let me know. Charlie RV-7 finish kit stage -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3267 (20080714) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3267 (20080714) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com