Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.101] (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2773939 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:00:40 -0500 Received: from o7y6b5 (clt78-020.carolina.rr.com [24.93.78.20]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id hAQK0XPg010053 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:00:37 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000401c3b457$541dcf20$1702a8c0@WorkGroup> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: radiator size Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:56:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: radiator size > Ed, > > I hereby award you the "gracious, kindly, coherent, helpful, non- > confrontational response" award - on behalf of the FlyRotary list > (but with no authority to do so other than my own desire to say "thank you" > for such even-tempered, helpful, 'go the extra mile', and 'above and beyond > the call of duty' participation in this valuable e-mail forum.) > > David Carter Thanks, David - appreciate you comments. Makes it worthwhile! I certainly have big gaps in my knowledge and understanding, but having been at it a bit longer than some (trying to elminate the gaps not increase them {:>)) and having more than my fair share of "ReDos", I believe I am slowing gaining a better understanding of the situation. As I frequently note - my advice is worth what you guys pay for it {:>). I too have "copied" parts of other installations. One such instance was copying a complete induction system and another instance was an oil cooler configuration. The copying of the induction system was a flop - why, because it was designed for a racing rotary turning around 9500 rpm - very disimilar configuration to my engine and operating regime. The second instance was a resounding success, my oil cooling problem went away - why, identicial aircraft, identical engine, with identical (or close enought) operating regimes. So in that case what worked for another rotary powered RV-6 ( after adding an identifical oil cooler in a nearly identical location) also worked for me. So certainly, look at other successful installations - but, evaluate how close your installation and operating regime is to that the successful one. If its close - probably a good thing to copy it. If not close, then you should give it a lot of though in my opinion - it may work, or again - it may not. Ed Anderson