Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #44988
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Looking for a rear counterweight
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:05:15 -0500
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Yes, I would no longer consider porting a six port myself, but back in 92 I knew a bit less about the rotary engine.  Besides, if the rebuilder had either talked me out of it OR had not charged me for it, the situation would have been a bit different. 

 

I personally prefer the turbo block for porting myself.  I used the Racing Beat Street port on my turbo block and it really woke it up.

 

By the way, did Jason get his situation sorted out?

 

 

Ed

 


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Eslick
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 12:06 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Looking for a rear counterweight

 

Ed,

I guess you have seen the Mazdatrix web site where they discourage the whole porting thing with a 6-port.  Just the opposite of what Lynn proposes. 

Bill

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com> wrote:

That's interesting to hear, Bill.  My first engine was an 86 N/A that was suppose to have been street ported (I paid to have it done), but when I later tore it down, much to my surprise there had been no porting done.  So I ported the next engine myself – at least I got my money's worth {:>).

 

 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster