Contrary to intuition – two parallel
mufflers actually reduce the sound less than one of the same type. If you
have both rotor pulses going through a single muffler you have a dominant high
energy frequency (at 6000 rpm) of 200 Hz to filter. If you have a single
rotor exhaust port with its separate muffler then the dominant freq for each
muffler is now 100Hz rather than 200Hz. The dimensions for two mufflers
of equivalent effectiveness would need to be approx twice as large for the 100Hz
pulse of which you are required to hang TWO of these twice as larger
hummers underneath to get the same effectiveness in sound suppression as using
one muffler half the dimensions – or something along those lines.
So a single muffler (for sound suppression)
appears to be a better way to go – now if you are looking for power
instead of sound suppression then the story can be different.
Having experimented with several different
approaches, the one that seemed to have the most promise was the one in which I
placed 3” diameter 1/8” thick Stainless Steel discs. The
discs had vanes cut from the outer perimeter down to within 3/8 – 1/2”
of the center. Then each vane was bent approx 45 deg to the plane of the
disc. These then had a 3/8” dia hole drilled down the center and a
rod on which 5 discs were strung and first locked in using jam nuts (don’t
bother trying) and later welded to the rod.
The idea was that the pulse in the exhaust
would in effect see (straight on) an almost solid metal disc and bounce back
what pulse go through the first disc would find a 2nd and 3rd
and 4th etc, where as the exhaust gas would fairly easily flow
around the blades and through the discs – relatively unimpeded (so the
theory went {:>)).
The first one I made I used a 2” dia
tube and discs – it was tremendously effective in suppressing the sound –
unfortunately it was equally effective in suppressing power. So I
concluded I needed a larger tube – so went to the 3” dia tube and
six discs.
This one I thought was really the solution
(and may have been if I had continued development) as it was very effective in suppressing
the sound (although not quite as much as the 2” tube) and I got 6000 rpm
static. Ah ha! I thought – this is it!!! I have succeeded. So
I buckled up and ran the engine up to 6000 rpm and launched. The only unfortunate
aspect of the flight is that I never got over 6000 rpm static
{:<(.
I then cut the number of disc back to 4
and that appear to do the job. However, my next flight was down to Tracy’s
Crook. I was later told by a witness to my take off that it sound like I
had a turbine engine under the cowl (more on that later). In any case, I
noticed about 20 minutes into the flight that the EGT on one exhaust was up
into the 1700 + range whereas my normal EGT was more like 1550 -1600 max.
After landing at Tracy Crooks, I decided to determine what the problem was.
It turns out that the discs in one tube had
broken loose of their jam nuts and were free wheeling like a turbine blade
inside the tube. Not only were the tips of the discs burnished but you could
clearly see the polishing effect of their rubbing against the inside of the 3”
tube. So that explained the high EGT on the one tube (and the
turbine sound reported) the discs were acting like a freewheeling prop and
impeding the flow of exhaust gas.
So I decided to reduce the number of discs
down to 3 and Tracy
was nice enough to weld the disc to the rod. Well, that seem to be the
answer. I was getting good power and good sound suppression still.
However, the discs only stayed welded to the rods for approx 2-3 weeks, and
then I began to find pieces of disc back by the end of the tube. The
pulse was too powerful and were slowly beating the stuffings out of the SS
blades on the discs and they were breaking off and leaving the tube .
By that time the expense (and more telling
- the work) of six experimentation with mufflers had taken their toll. I decided
to have my two tube header modified into one tube - turns out it cost twice to
modify the header as two hushpower mufflers. So I just kept my old
10 year old header of stainless steel pipe and put on two hushpower
mufflers. Not as quite as my experimental design – but they have
lasted.
So good luck folks, I’m eagerly
awaiting the magic muffler design.
Ed
Ed
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Mark Steitle
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009
10:57 AM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Mistral
muffler.
Thanks for the suggestion, but I initially felt that the Hushpower 2
was too heavy (10#/ea). I used it anyway out of desperation. So, I really
don't want to be dragging two of them around with me everywhere I go if I can
help it. I'm ready to give Al's design a try.