X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fmailhost03.isp.att.net ([207.115.11.53] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.11) with ESMTP id 3410546 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:27:31 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.115.11.53; envelope-from=ceengland@bellsouth.net Received: from [192.168.10.7] (adsl-147-216-168.jan.bellsouth.net[72.147.216.168]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc03) with ESMTP id <20090104212653H0300dprh4e>; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:26:53 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [72.147.216.168] Message-ID: <4961299E.2000200@bellsouth.net> Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:26:54 -0600 From: Charlie England User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Conical mount References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit George Lendich wrote: > Can anyone give a brief explanation of the conical engine mount, and > why it's built the way that it is. Not that I intend building one, > just curious as to why the mount points are turned inwardly and appear > to be focused at some point - is this a theoretical focus point that > has the CG of the engine at it's focus? > George (down under) That's the dynafocal mount. You've got the right idea about the reason. There are at least 2 versions; the 2nd type is for some engines used on twins that have extended hub props (cg is farther forward, and the converge point of the bolts is also). The conical mount has all 4 bolts parallel. Charlie