Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #4429
From: sqpilot@earthlink <sqpilot@earthlink.net>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Core vs Radistor was Re: [FlyRotary] radiator
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:33:47 -0500
To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:16 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Core vs Radistor was Re: [FlyRotary] radiator

Boy, you catch me every time{:>)
 
Thanks for the info Rusty
 
 Paul,
 
    I calculate out Rusty's radiator to have a volume of 17.5*24.25*2.25 = 964 in^3.  Given that he was running a turbo, he would naturally want/need more cooling capacity than a NA block.  So his basic radiator was approx 50% large in volume than two cores.  Since he could produce up to that much additional power with his turbo, it would appear that his is sized about right - perhaps a bit on the large size since he probably would not run under high boost at cruise. 
 
MESSAGE CUT TO SAVE DOWNLOAD TIME, ETC
 
  IBut, in any case, I think your currently planned radiator size is undersized.  FWIW - always keepin mind my knowledge of radiators and cooling is quite limited.
 
 
Ed
 
Ed Anderson
RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered
Matthews, NC
eanderson@carolina.rr.com
Your knowledge of radiators and cooling may be limited....however, my knowledge of radiators and cooling could be written on the head of a match. Thanks for your valuable input, Ed.  I was trying to come up with a radiator that could be placed directly in front of the NACA duct, as Al Wick did.  I will probably go with a larger radiator, EWP and fan.   Thanks again.  Paul Conner
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster