Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #4408
From: Russell Duffy <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Core vs Radistor was Re: [FlyRotary] radiator
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:06:06 -0600
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
 Rusty, what was the size of your radiator and the final determination about its adequacy?
 
Ed
 
 
This is revenge for those engine out comments, isn't it :-)
 
I started with a huge radiator, because it had (alleged) oil coolers in it.  The oil coolers didn't work out, and were bypassed, leaving only water cooling.   
 

The rad core width is 17.25, and the length as been changed.  Full length is 24.25”  (423 sq in) .  The length (not covered)  was first tested at 17.75 "   (306 sq in) .  The final length (not covered) was 12.625”  (218 sq in) .  HALF the original radiator.  The core is 2.25” thick if anyone is doing the math .   The other thing to consider is that the covered portion of the radiator is only covered on the front side.  The back side is open.  While there is no air passing through, turbulent air around the back side will still be removing some heat from the covered section.  There is also a 2" thick oil cooler behind the uncovered area of radiator, so overall, this is about 4.5" thick.   

 

Here is a chart of inlet, rad size, and temps for climb at around 100- 110 mph.   The cheek outlet is fixed at about 66 sq in,  and the bottom opening is about 83 sq in.   OAT is ground temp, not in-flight.   

 

Date    |Inlet (sq in)|  Rad core (sq in)  |  water temp F     |  oil temp F         | OAT | comments

 

             80              |  423                      |  <180 (t-stat)     |  180                    |  80    |  bottom outlet open

             80              |  306                      |  <180 (t-stat)     |  180                    |  80    |  bottom outlet open

10-18 | 48               |  306                      |  180 (no t-stat)  |  230                    |  75

10-18 | 80               |  218                      |  160 (no-t-stat)  |  185 (not max?)  |  70

10-19 | 80               |  218                      |  160 (no-t-stat)  |  220+                  |  80

11-01 | 80               |  218                      |  160 (no t-stat)  |  200                     |  80   |  bottom outlet open 

 

My current (changes every week) plan is to go with a core that is still 2.25" thick, but gives me about 300 sq inches of frontal area.  That will be more than I need now, but since I'll be putting the oil cooler in front of it to lower the oil temps, I'll need more radiator than I do now.  

 

One final comment about expensive radiators, I wouldn't buy one, unless you have a very good reason to believe it will be just what you need.  For example, I'll be retiring an $800+ dollar radiator with my rev-2 cowl. 

 

Cheers,

Rusty

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster