Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.102] (HELO ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2751767 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:45:07 -0500 Received: from o7y6b5 (clt78-020.carolina.rr.com [24.93.78.20]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id hAJIj5Fn010151 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:45:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <001301c3aecc$c8b878c0$1702a8c0@WorkGroup> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: radiator size Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:41:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Joe, I think you have to define your operating conditions before you could begin to determine an optimum volume. High Power and low airspeeds would perhaps imply need for large, thin radiators due to the lower dynamic pressure at those speeds. High power and high airspeeds might indicate small, thick radiators would work fine due to the higher dynamic pressure. The lower the power setting in any operating regime the less the cooling required. More Power = More Waste Heat = More Cooling required. Cruise power settings are normally a bit lower than take off, so at cruise the cooling problem becomes a bit easier. But, like most things in the flying game, its a matter of compromise and trying to find the best compromise for your selected operating regime. In other words, there is no best single answer - it all depends. I think we have enough folks flying RV aircraft with two evaporator cores to indicate that somewhere around 650 in^3 of core does the job adequately for their typical operating regime. However, we still encounter operating regimes such has high power climbout on a hot day that will temporarily exceed even our cores cooling capabilities until power is reduced or greater airspeed is attained. Ed Ed Anderson RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Berki" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 12:16 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: radiator size > I would like to know what the optimum volume is. It is interesting to note > that Tracy is using two cores and had a duct problem with one and had > sufficient cooling. See cooling test at his web site. I think he changed > the inlet and improved the cooling. The type of AC fast vs slow is > important (high power at low speed) like climb out . If we optimize the > inlet how small could the rad be? I think a pusher would be a perfect bed > for a long duct. Worse case would be ground cooling. > > > At 11:01 AM 11/19/2003 -0600, David Carter wrote: > >408 cubic inches is short of the 600 to 750 that are being used > >successfully. I posted my a/c core sizes yesterday - 336.65 cubic inches of > >fin area X 2 = 673 cub inches - that will be enough. > > > >David Carter > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "sqpilot@earthlink" > >To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > >Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:55 AM > >Subject: [FlyRotary] radiator > > > > > >Hi, fellow rotary enthusiasts.....I'm getting ready to order a radiator for > >my 13b powered SQ2000 canard pusher. I talked to Al Wick, and he has a 160 > >hp Subaru powered Cozy and is cooling it very well with a radiator that is > >17" x 7.25" x 3" deep. Any idea if that size might also cool a rotary? How > >does that seem to compare with two GM evaporator cores? I was told that if > >I can increase the height to 8 inches instead of 7.25, they can put two fans > >on it, as well as the built-in Meziere EWP. I can work with the additional > >height of 8 inches. Just don't want to spend $1100.00 for too small a > >radiator. If 17x8x3 equates to approximately the same size as two evaporator > >cores like Ed Anderson is using, I should be OK. If anyone can compare the > >square inches of the two, I would sure appreciate it. Thanks in advance for > >any and all efforts and recommendations. Paul Conner > > > > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html