Return-Path: Received: from seraph2.grc.nasa.gov ([128.156.10.11] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2751639 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:16:46 -0500 Received: from lombok-fi.grc.nasa.gov (lombok-fi.grc.nasa.gov [139.88.112.33]) by seraph2.grc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E2868991 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:16:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from apataki-fi.grc.nasa.gov (apataki-fi.grc.nasa.gov [139.88.112.35]) by lombok-fi.grc.nasa.gov (NASA GRC TCPD 8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAJHGjQx004875 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:16:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from GESS20.grc.nasa.gov (gess20.grc.nasa.gov [139.88.63.20]) by apataki-fi.grc.nasa.gov (8.12.10 GRC/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAJHGjid028626; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:16:45 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20031119120626.0300ef90@pop.grc.nasa.gov> X-Sender: scberki@pop.grc.nasa.gov X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:16:45 -0500 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" , "Rotary motors in aircraft" From: Joseph Berki Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: radiator size In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed I would like to know what the optimum volume is. It is interesting to note that Tracy is using two cores and had a duct problem with one and had sufficient cooling. See cooling test at his web site. I think he changed the inlet and improved the cooling. The type of AC fast vs slow is important (high power at low speed) like climb out . If we optimize the inlet how small could the rad be? I think a pusher would be a perfect bed for a long duct. Worse case would be ground cooling. At 11:01 AM 11/19/2003 -0600, David Carter wrote: >408 cubic inches is short of the 600 to 750 that are being used >successfully. I posted my a/c core sizes yesterday - 336.65 cubic inches of >fin area X 2 = 673 cub inches - that will be enough. > >David Carter > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "sqpilot@earthlink" >To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" >Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:55 AM >Subject: [FlyRotary] radiator > > >Hi, fellow rotary enthusiasts.....I'm getting ready to order a radiator for >my 13b powered SQ2000 canard pusher. I talked to Al Wick, and he has a 160 >hp Subaru powered Cozy and is cooling it very well with a radiator that is >17" x 7.25" x 3" deep. Any idea if that size might also cool a rotary? How >does that seem to compare with two GM evaporator cores? I was told that if >I can increase the height to 8 inches instead of 7.25, they can put two fans >on it, as well as the built-in Meziere EWP. I can work with the additional >height of 8 inches. Just don't want to spend $1100.00 for too small a >radiator. If 17x8x3 equates to approximately the same size as two evaporator >cores like Ed Anderson is using, I should be OK. If anyone can compare the >square inches of the two, I would sure appreciate it. Thanks in advance for >any and all efforts and recommendations. Paul Conner > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html