X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fmailhost01.isp.att.net ([207.115.11.51] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.5) with ESMTP id 3035514 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:59:18 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.115.11.51; envelope-from=keltro@att.net Received: from fwebmail01.isp.att.net ([204.127.218.101]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc01) with SMTP id <20080721145841H0100mf12je>; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:58:41 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [204.127.218.101] Received: from [4.245.48.106] by fwebmail01.isp.att.net; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:58:40 +0000 From: "Kelly Troyer" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: exhaust manifold Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:58:40 +0000 Message-Id: <072120081458.17084.4884A4200004CE7D000042BC22218865869B0A02D29B9B0EBF019D9B040A05@att.net> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Jun 10 2008) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VsdHJvQGF0dC5uZXQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_17084_1216652320_0" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_17084_1216652320_0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Michael, Other than the loss of exhaust scavenging and the resulting slight loss of power as Ernest mentioned there should be no down side and 155 hp should not be a problem with an efficient intake system ....Are you going with fuel injection ??............ -- Kelly Troyer=20 "Dyke Delta"_13B ROTARY Engine=20 "RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2=20 "Mistral"_Backplate/Oil Manifold=20 -------------- Original message from Ernest Christley : --------------=20 > Michael Silvius wrote:=20 > > Folks:=20 > > > I have no intention of ruining a turbo on my engine but the notion of= using a mostly ready made manifold is appealing. I am thinking of adapting= one of these turbo manifolds, delete the waste gate pipe and continue on w= ith the exhaust pipe where the turbo would normally be mounted. Not looking= to make more than=20 > about 155hp. Anything I am missing here?=20 > > > http://images.marketplaceadvisor.channeladvisor.com/fullView.asp?id= =3D241330336&fc=20 > =3D0&img=3Dhttp://www.stockreco.com/fc3sheader04.jpg=20 > >=20 > > Michael in Maine=20 > >=20 > You'll destroy any hope of ever being able to do exhaust scavenging. Do= =20 > you think the company might consider doing a version of their Mvc-RX72f= =20 > without the wastegate? http://www.ssautochrome.com/level.itml/icOid/1357= =20 >=20 > --=20 >=20 > http://www.ronpaultimeline.com=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=20 > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.= html=20 --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_17084_1216652320_0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_17084_1216652320_1" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_17084_1216652320_1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
  Michael,
      Other than the loss of exhaust scavengi= ng and the resulting slight
loss of power as Ernest mentioned there  should be no down&n= bsp;side and
155 hp should not be a problem with an efficient intake system ..= ..Are
you going with fuel injection ??............
--
Kelly Troyer
"Dyke Delta"_1= 3B ROTARY Engine
"RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2
"Mistral"_Backplate/Oil Manifol= d



 
-------------- Original message from Ernest Christley <ec= hristley@nc.rr.com>: --------------


> Michael Silvius wro= te:
> > Folks:
> > > I have no intention of ruining = a turbo on my engine but the notion of using a mostly ready made manifold i= s appealing. I am thinking of adapting one of these turbo manifolds, delete= the waste gate pipe and continue on with the exhaust pipe where the turbo = would normally be mounted. Not looking to make more than
> about 155= hp. Anything I am missing here?
> > > http://images.marketplac= eadvisor.channeladvisor.com/fullView.asp?id=3D241330336&fc
> =3D= 0&img=3Dhttp://www.stockreco.com/fc3sheader04.jpg
> >
>= ; > Michael in Maine
> >
> You'll destroy any hope of e= ver being able to do exhaust scavenging. Do
> you think the company = might consider doing a version of their Mvc-RX72f
> without the wast= egate? http://www.ssautochrome.com/level.itml/icOid/1357
>
> = --
>
> http://www.ronpaultimeline.com
>
>
&= gt;
> --
> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archi= ve and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_17084_1216652320_1-- --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_17084_1216652320_0--