X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail14.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.195] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.2) with ESMTPS id 2880762 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 01 May 2008 18:50:51 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.195; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d220-237-232-70.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.237.232.70]) by mail14.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id m41Mo6w0031251 for ; Fri, 2 May 2008 08:50:07 +1000 Message-ID: <003301c8abdd$b7ee50b0$6400a8c0@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] radiator orientation? Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 08:50:13 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0657-0, 12/12/2006), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean > Anyonene see any issues of concern with instaling the radiators in the > vertical orientation as oposed to their normal orientation with the inlets > and outlet on the top. These are evaporator cores from a JMC Jimmy- Chevy > Blazer > > Michael in Maine Michael, The front adds significantly to the flat plate drag and anything you can do to reduce that affects the total drag. Are you happy with the front width, could it be reduced with some angle on the rads? George ( down under)