X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from QMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.48] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c4) with ESMTP id 2626031 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:06:50 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.62.48; envelope-from=gregw@onestopdesign.biz Received: from OMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.59]) by QMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id XTXh1Y0081GhbT80507i00; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:06:10 +0000 Received: from gregoryii ([24.6.40.29]) by OMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id XV631Y00K0dkeQQ3T00000; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:06:06 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=7uA7LCE2IRQyHJPLz_EA:9 a=uhh1FXkqLMQVkUxNvE7sa67B_bAA:4 a=e4v08Dc6ksEA:10 a=3I_whO4B8K8A:10 a=RXsNbImW8a8T3gboqxAA:9 a=VW6pjh4ASnOBR4MSKZwA:7 a=CY1ufcQWYczq7bW5rCq4qoN6etYA:4 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=AfD3MYMu9mQA:10 Message-ID: <005101c84bd0$e899bf50$8801a8c0@yosemite.onestopdesign.biz> From: "Greg Ward" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Happy New Year! Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:16:38 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004E_01C84B8D.D90CDD30" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004E_01C84B8D.D90CDD30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just wanted to wish all another happy New Year, and confirm I was still = on this list (damn spamchecker!) Thanks; Greg Ward ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Bill Eslick=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 1:08 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop recommendations Works fine. Don't know that you can tell any difference from a = standard cut unless you have good instrumentation, but it is supposed to = be slightly quieter. Bill Eslick On Dec 29, 2007 9:19 AM, Brooks Wolfe < slipstream@wavecable.com> = wrote: How's that bicamber airfoil? I'd thought that was a bit of a = gimmick.. Brooks=20 =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_004E_01C84B8D.D90CDD30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just wanted to wish all another happy New Year, = and=20 confirm I was still on this list (damn spamchecker!)
Thanks;
Greg Ward
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Bill = Eslick=20
Sent: Saturday, December 29, = 2007 1:08=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop=20 recommendations

Works fine.  Don't know that you can tell any = difference=20 from a standard cut unless you have good instrumentation, but it is = supposed=20 to be slightly quieter.

Bill Eslick

On Dec 29, 2007 9:19 AM, Brooks Wolfe < slipstream@wavecable.com>= =20 wrote:

How's that bicamber airfoil?  I'd thought that was a = bit of=20 a gimmick..
 
Brooks 
 
------=_NextPart_000_004E_01C84B8D.D90CDD30--