X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from x.itlnet.net ([64.19.112.9] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c4) with ESMTPS id 2624276 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:04:39 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.19.112.9; envelope-from=jwvoto@itlnet.net Received: from x.itlnet.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by x.itlnet.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id lBTL3fwZ007475 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:03:41 -0600 Received: from itlnet.net (email1.itlnet.net [192.168.10.156]) by x.itlnet.net (x.itlnet.net [172.16.1.148]) id jBSF3f1255647078Do ret-id none; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:03:42 -0600 Received: from JWVOTO (unverified [64.19.114.131]) by itlnet.net (SurgeMail 3.8p) with ESMTP id 160716-1769559 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:03:41 -0600 Message-ID: <001101c84a5e$8d9cbda0$83721340@JWVOTO> From: "Wendell Voto" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop recommendations Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:05:28 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000E_01C84A2C.3F998020" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Authenticated-User: jwvoto@itlnet.net X-ITLnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ITLnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ITLnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.599, required 4, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -2.60, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, SPF_HELO_PASS -0.00) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C84A2C.3F998020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Bill Eslick=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 5:59 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop recommendations I used a Prop Inc, prop initially. No problems, many layers and a = solid prop. I also had a Felix prop, and ended up using it, as the = Props, Inc. has too much twist and I just never had it cut back. Which direction are you turning? Mine is backwards, but if it would = work I can make you a deal.=20 Bill Eslick RV-6 13B EC2 EFISM RD-1 Thanks Bill, I'm building a Cozy pusher type. Wendell On Dec 28, 2007 5:19 PM, Wendell Voto wrote: ----- Has anyone had or know of someone that has had experience = with Props Inc. propellers? Cost is low, is the quality the same? Wendell ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C84A2C.3F998020 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Bill = Eslick=20
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 = 5:59=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop=20 recommendations

I used a Prop Inc, prop initially.  No problems, many layers = and a=20 solid prop.  I also had a Felix prop, and ended up using it, as = the=20 Props, Inc. has too much twist and I just never had it cut = back.

Which=20 direction are you turning?  Mine is backwards, but if it would = work I can=20 make you a deal.

Bill Eslick
RV-6 13B EC2 EFISM = RD-1
Thanks Bill,
I'm building a Cozy pusher = type.
Wendell


 
On Dec 28, 2007 5:19 PM, Wendell Voto <jwvoto@itlnet.net> wrote:
 
-----=20 Has anyone had or know of someone that has had experience with = Props Inc.=20 propellers?  Cost is low, is the quality the same?
 
Wendell
------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C84A2C.3F998020--