X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from wavecable.net ([24.113.32.38] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c4) with ESMTP id 2623937 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:19:44 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.113.32.38; envelope-from=slipstream@wavecable.com Received: from [24.113.70.31] (HELO wolfes) by wavecable.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 240110495 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 07:19:04 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <47766565.000001.02608@WOLFES> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 07:19:01 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; charset="ISO-8859-1"; boundary="------------Boundary-00=_P7HTQL80000000000000" X-Mailer: IncrediMail (5683226) From: "Brooks Wolfe" References: X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-Priority: 3 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop recommendations --------------Boundary-00=_P7HTQL80000000000000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable How's that bicamber airfoil? I'd thought that was a bit of a gimmick..=0D =0D Brooks =0D =0D -------Original Message-------=0D =0D From: Bill Eslick=0D Date: 12/28/2007 3:59:52 PM=0D To: Rotary motors in aircraft=0D Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop recommendations=0D =0D I used a Prop Inc, prop initially. No problems, many layers and a solid prop. I also had a Felix prop, and ended up using it, as the Props, Inc. has too much twist and I just never had it cut back.=0D =0D Which direction are you turning? Mine is backwards, but if it would work= I can make you a deal. =0D =0D Bill Eslick=0D RV-6 13B EC2 EFISM RD-1=0D =0D =0D =0D On Dec 28, 2007 5:19 PM, Wendell Voto wrote:=0D =0D =0D ----- Has anyone had or know of someone that has had experience with Prop= s Inc. propellers? Cost is low, is the quality the same?=0D =0D Wendell=0D =0D =0D =20 --------------Boundary-00=_P7HTQL80000000000000 Content-Type: Text/HTML; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
How's that bicamber airfoil?  I'd thought that was a bit of a g= immick..
 
Brooks 
 
-------Original Message----= ---
 
Date: 12/28/2007 3= :59:52 PM
Subject: [FlyRotar= y] Re: Prop recommendations
 
I used a Prop Inc, prop initially.  No problems, ma= ny layers and a solid prop.  I also had a Felix prop, and ended up u= sing it, as the Props, Inc. has too much twist and I just never had it cu= t back.

Which direction are you turning?  Mine is backwards, = but if it would work I can make you a deal.

Bill Eslick
RV-6 1= 3B EC2 EFISM RD-1


On Dec 28, 2007 5:19 PM, Wendell Voto <jwvoto@itlnet.net> wrote:
 
----- Has anyone had or know of someone that has had experience with= Props Inc. propellers?  Cost is low, is the quality the same?
 
Wendell

 
--------------Boundary-00=_P7HTQL80000000000000--