X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.241.41] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1) with ESMTP id 2608593 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:23:46 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.41; envelope-from=dale.r@cox.net Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20071221172305.MURH11174.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:23:05 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([72.223.44.63]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id TVP81Y0091Mmy9C0000000; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:23:08 -0500 Message-ID: <476BF678.2050003@cox.net> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:23:04 -0700 From: Dale Rogers User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Supercharging References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit FWIW dept.: It seems like multiple companies are making belt-driver centrifugal superchargers on basically the same model. From what I've read so far, Paxton and Vortec have merged, even though they seem to have completely separate sites. Or maybe Paxton was spun off again after the merge? The products look almost identical except for the name on the scroll casting (same 1 - 4.7 gearing.) Then there is Procharger; again a Vortec Clone, it appears. Take a look at this setup, specifically for a 13B: [ http://www.mazdatrix.com/8forcedinduction.htm ] Hmmm. Dale R COZY MkIV #0497 Ch.13 COZY MkIV #1254 Ch. 05 Ed Anderson wrote: > Same thing I received even though mine was supposedly for a Rx-7 > rotary engine. So appears their system is universal {:>). I am just > amazed at how much they offer for $99.50. > > Ok, who is going to be the first to order one and let us know? > > David Leonard, suggested either go for full time power (like in a > real turbocharger) or forget it and don't muck around with this part > time power enhancement. Has a good point. Yes, I get in and out of > short fields just fine with my N/A 13B - but, I just really like > getting all that space between my butt and those tree tops as I can > {:>). > > But, I fairly certain that I will save my shekels for an N/A Renesis > engine rather than turbo my old 13B. I mean with 20 more HP from the > N/A Renesis - it will almost be enough {:>) > > Ed