X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c2) with ESMTP id 2471977 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:13:06 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.182.184; envelope-from=wdleonard@gmail.com Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 30so216593nfu for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:12:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=HQcJfjUwaT1miUuQM4uQjn8hdRjZGvDVy37qi8Bahl8=; b=gH5DxBbcwRaytT6OtMjb+n52AkSPXHDhNA0/rdiscqHXYmgvozxVwOErT8blJPwhki9x1HWihFGlKs2AB5wwM5RNoB5Iw7lruvRRnNla/wut5puTCsWD2LH6rEhUbDXBqNL2K3SvllDkouKxkl8bl0B//ci77+lNu7vwcThhKu8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=UXwQu1pPLCbV+d2Wh8KJNivMXe1E27kpth+cRV+Mzmv6sQOT3tDJliIpwYZvalgkQU9qTnv5p5AWVsHztivcwdf1idk7hsHEtol0viXou8JgvVDnMxJmmdqLKEr8WIW2e/zZllRl5YjdRfYnAgDpvgkZ22mfgvFmdEtDtVieUUA= Received: by 10.86.89.4 with SMTP id m4mr7016665fgb.1195056746773; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:12:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.98.1 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:12:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1c23473f0711140812k142bd013xb9ffa47e97658a29@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:12:26 -0800 From: "David Leonard" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Rebutal to the rebutal {:>) Thick vs Thin was : Diffuser Con In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3598_4396856.1195056746774" References: ------=_Part_3598_4396856.1195056746774 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline :-) Absolutely, but that rule applies the everything you hear from everyone else as well. Dave Leonard On Nov 13, 2007 8:05 PM, wrote: > "...Anxiously awaiting reason for Delta T difference between rads but > will probably not buy it. (but still realize there is a very real > possibility that I am wrong). > > Dave Leonard" > > Dave: > Could the "real possibility" (mentioned above) have anything to do with > the "50% probability" of receiving wrong information as presented by you > during your turbo discussion at Tracy's? See, I was paying attention! > :) > > dl > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > See what's new at AOL.com and Make > AOL Your Homepage > . > -- David Leonard Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY http://N4VY.RotaryRoster.net http://RotaryRoster.net ------=_Part_3598_4396856.1195056746774 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline :-)  Absolutely, but that rule applies the everything you hear from everyone else as well.

Dave Leonard

On Nov 13, 2007 8:05 PM, <DLOMHEIM@aol.com > wrote:
"...Anxiously awaiting reason for Delta T difference between rads but will probably not buy it. (but still realize there is a very real possibility that I am wrong).

Dave Leonard"
 
Dave: 
Could the "real possibility" (mentioned above) have anything to do with the "50% probability" of receiving wrong information as presented by you during your turbo discussion at Tracy's?  See, I was paying attention!  :)   
 
dl
 

 




See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.



--
David Leonard

Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY
http://N4VY.RotaryRoster.net
http://RotaryRoster.net ------=_Part_3598_4396856.1195056746774--