Robert,
If you look at the photo of Jerry Hey's mount that was attached you can see
the Lord mounts. These are a bit larger than the front mounts on the plate type
mount. IMHO these would survive the torquing of a thrown blade better than the
smaller narrow spacing of the plate mount. Even though there are more mounts the
wider arm spacing on the S-beam would probably hold out for longer having
re-visited them. I don't think it really maters though since shortly it will rip
every bolt right out of the firewall anyway! This REALLY is one of those rarely
surviveable failures. You are better off to lose the entire prop. At least that
way you might be able to dead stick it in. Why are we wasting so much time going
down this 5 miles of bad road anyway? You might ask which of those two wing
spars will last longer if struck by a meteor. If your wing falls off you are in
serious trouble wouldn't you agree? If your engine parts company with the
mount for any reason you are in a highly life threatening situation. The prop
sheading a blade is something that can easily cause that to happen if you don't
get it turned off fast enough. Unless the engine is welded ot bolted
directly to the firewall the engine will come loose if you don't stop that
propeller.
Bill
Bill or anyone,
I guess I need to change my question to
more specifics. For example, what do you think of the single point attachment
on the rear of the s-beam verses the more substantial attachment of the flat
plate mount. I personally don't know if I feel comfortable with a single point
of attachment in the rear. For example, there may be times when the
engine gets torqued around due to sudden changes of flight
direction.
Robert