X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imo-d04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.36] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) with ESMTP id 2279653 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 02:27:09 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.157.36; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.2.) id q.d46.11b1613c (42808) for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 02:26:26 -0400 (EDT) From: WRJJRS@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 02:26:26 EDT Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: engine mounts To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1187850386" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5042 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1187850386 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 8/22/2007 7:57:15 PM Pacific Standard Time, Lehanover@aol.com writes: I would (will) go with the flat plate. All of the pan bolts are involved. Four Lord style mounts involved. Compact and uses the engine block for added stiffness. I will include the nose gear in my mount to reduce fire wall complexity. Possible oil control benefit. Lynn E. Hanover Lynn, Well reasoned, but it you use a slightly changed version of the Shertz mount like Jerry Hey is now making the mount uses the bellhousing bolts and fits between the Psru plate and the engine. Using two large lord mounts and that system I believe it's a toss up. I really don't think you can really plan for this though unless you always fly high and carry a 'chute! Bill Jepson ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour -------------------------------1187850386 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 8/22/2007 7:57:15 PM Pacific Standard Time,=20 Lehanover@aol.com writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>
I would (will) go with the flat plate. All of the pan bolts are=20 involved. Four Lord style mounts involved.
Compact and uses the engine block for added stiffness. I will include= the=20 nose gear in my mount to reduce fire wall complexity. Possible oil=20 control benefit.
 
Lynn E. Hanover 

Lynn,
Well reasoned, but it you use a slightly changed version of the Shertz=20 mount like Jerry Hey is now making the mount uses the bellhousing bolts and=20= fits=20 between the Psru plate and the engine. Using two large lord mounts and that=20 system I believe it's a toss up. I really don't think you can really plan fo= r=20 this though unless you always fly high and carry a 'chute!
Bill Jepson



Get a sne= ak peek of the all-new AOL.com. -------------------------------1187850386--