Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #39127
From: <Lehanover@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] engine mounts
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:56:15 EDT
To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
In a message dated 8/22/2007 10:22:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, rob@mum.edu writes:
Here's a question for everyone.
I just received a 20B Rotary from Bruce Turrentine to put in my BD4 which I currently fly with a Ford V6. Now, I need to build an engine mount for the 20B but I can't decide whether to use the s-beam mount or the flat plate mount like Tracy uses. They both have advantaged, but my question is, in a worst case scenario, like if I should through a prop blade, which of the two mounts mentioned above will keep the engine connected to the plane longer? Or are there other alternatives that might be better?
I would love to hear any and all opinions on this subject.
 
Robert Bollinger
FM1099 MUM
Fairfield IA 52557
(641)472-7000 ex2068
(641)919-3213 cell
rob@mum.edu
 I would (will) go with the flat plate. All of the pan bolts are involved. Four Lord style mounts involved.
Compact and uses the engine block for added stiffness. I will include the nose gear in my mount to reduce fire wall complexity. Possible oil control benefit.
 
Lynn E. Hanover 




Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com.
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster