Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #38655
From: Ron Springer <ron2369@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Flying
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
60% antifreeze and 40% water is the lowest according
to this website which includes a chart:

http://www.gi.alaska.edu/ScienceForum/ASF6/680.html

Ron Springer
Folsom, CA

--- David Staten <Dastaten@earthlink.net> wrote:

Steve Brooks wrote:

>I've been working so many hours lately that I
really have not had much time
>for flying.  It had been a month since I had flown
my turbo rotary powered
>Cozy IV, though I had run it on two occasions
prior.
>
>On the 4th of July, I drained the anti-freeze, and
replaced it with
>distilled water.  Well, maybe 5% antifreeze is
left, but not more than that.
>
>
>I took of this morning, with the OAT at 70 degrees.
 I took off at my usual
>5 lbs of boost on the turbo, and rotated at 80
knots about 1500 feet later.
>While the flight was outstanding, with smooth air
an nearly unlimited
>visibility, I did not see any marked improvement in
the straight water, over
>the 50/50 water / antifreeze mixture.
>
>  >
The advantage out of a 50/50 mix is that it will
boil at a higher temp and freeze at a lower temp than any other ratio of
water/antifreeze. Ask any high school chemistry teacher.  Improved cooling
is not typically one of the benefits seen, if all other variables are
kept equal.

Glad you had an uneventful flight.

Dave

--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:  
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster