|
In a message dated 7/6/2007 6:19:52 AM Pacific Standard Time,
eanderson@carolina.rr.com writes:
Jesse, I
sent an e mail to these folks asking them if they had any data on how
their plug performed under fouling conditions - both carbon and lead. Be
interesting to see what the response is - if I get one of course.
$25
is a lot to pay when the stock ones run $5-7 a piece, but if you fly much
with 100LL then you will find you need to replace them around 25 hours or
so. So if this plug overcame the fouling problem and gave a much longer
life, then they might be worth the price for that reason
along.
Ed >> Isn't 25 bucks each a lot to pay for an air
gapped plug ? There may be >> more to them than that but that is my
first reaction. We used to have to >> move plug wire back off plug
or cut small gap in wire to get a plug to >> fire when valve guide
seals went out and/or some other reason loaded >> combustion chamber
with oil. I first learned that from seeing used cars >> when worn
out and using a lot of oil with wire gapped and taped where >>
didn't notice. <g> >> jofarr, soddy
tn >>
It won't prevent fouling. If you have carbon on the insulator it will foul,
end of story. The problem isn't having enough voltage to fire. The problem is
being sure that the discharge jumps the gap instead of running down the face of
the insulator in the carbon. You can have a million volts but if the spark runs
on the surface it won't run any better. I have seen all kinds of high energy CDI
systems. They never worked any better.
Bill Jepson
|
|