X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-04.texas.rr.com ([24.93.47.43] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10) with ESMTP id 2154700 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:28:27 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.93.47.43; envelope-from=clouduster@austin.rr.com Received: from [10.0.0.99] (cpe-70-122-12-239.austin.res.rr.com [70.122.12.239]) by ms-smtp-04.texas.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l634RWoH012202 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2007 23:27:33 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4689D00F.40300@austin.rr.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:26:55 -0500 From: Dennis Haverlah User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: RV-7A cooling References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Ed, I have not installed a diverter to rob air from the water side at this time. I tested one with the wind tunnel set-up and it worked real well. Currently I have modified my lower cowl inlet ramp so that I get more flow through the oil cooler compared to the water side. I need some flight time to determine how it is working. I can epoxy in a diverter without removing the lower cowl if necessary. Dennis H. Ed Anderson wrote: > Hi Dennis, > > Test works, thanks for the update. > > Did you by any chance decide to try dividing the airflow along a > vertical plane to control air flow to your oil cooler - or saving that > for later if necessary? > > Good luck on your test flight, hope that takes care of the temps > > Ed > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dennis Haverlah" > > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 11:12 AM > Subject: [FlyRotary] RV-7A cooling > > >