X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from bay0-omc1-s36.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.108] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2112117 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:03:22 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.246.108; envelope-from=lors01@msn.com Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.250.25]) by bay0-omc1-s36.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:02:44 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:02:44 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.250.200 by by115fd.bay115.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:02:41 GMT X-Originating-IP: [75.104.126.119] X-Originating-Email: [lors01@msn.com] X-Sender: lors01@msn.com In-Reply-To: From: "Tracy crook" To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Bcc: Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Different Rotary Port configurations Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:02:41 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jun 2007 21:02:44.0504 (UTC) FILETIME=[2EA99980:01C7B2B5] Return-Path: lors01@msn.com DI would indeed be 'the bomb'. Hope Mazda picks up on this for the rotary because a DIY injector port into the combustion chamber is not something for the average home workshop! Tracy >From: wrjjrs@aol.com > >Yes Bob, The newest piezioelectric injectors will be capable of doing >exactly that. With a sofisticated enough EMS we could even run without a >throttle valve, but that is really for the future. I think Tracy's system >might even be able to fire the injector. I have an inquiry into Siemens >about the system. Used on the new gasoline Audis, and diesels for several >years. >Bill Jepson > > >-----Original Message----- >From: bmears9413@aol.com >To: Rotary motors in aircraft >Sent: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:05 am >Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Different Rotary Port configurations > > >Direct injection into the chamber after the intake port closed would be the >nuts I would think...If you can do that. If thats the case you could port >as you please without hurting your mpg. > >Bob Mears > > >-----Original Message----- >From: wrjjrs@aol.com >To: Rotary motors in aircraft >Sent: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 9:41 am >Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Different Rotary Port configurations > > >  >Bob,  > The engine in a Toyota Prius has overlap. My point is that it is NOT the >sole determination of economy. This isn't the biggest factor for >efficiency. I believe managing charge contamination is important, sure but >not the only factor. I think the new direct injection systems will work >very well with the rotary. The point is that getting the engine to pump the >most air at a given RPM is "THE WAY."  >Bill Jepson  >  >-----Original Message-----  >From: bmears9413@aol.com  >To: Rotary motors in aircraft flyrotary@lancaironline.net>  >Sent: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 5:54 am  >Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Different Rotary Port configurations  >  >  >And let me assure you, a P port will NOT get the same GPH. Theres a lot of >fuel wasted with the P Port due to the overlap in timing.  >  >   >  >Bob Mears  >  >Supermarine Spitfire  >  >________________________________________________________________________  > >AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from >AOL at AOL.com.  >=0  >  >--  >Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/  >Archive and UnSub: >http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html  > > >------------------------------------------------------------ >AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from >AOL at AOL.com. > > > >________________________________________________________________________ >AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free >from AOL at AOL.com. >=0 > >-- >Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >Archive and UnSub: >http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html