X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imo-d04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.36] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2111686 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:44:20 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.157.36; envelope-from=Lehanover@aol.com Received: from Lehanover@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.2.) id q.c9b.1196d609 (40521) for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:43:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Lehanover@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:43:41 EDT Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Different Rotary Port configurations To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1182275021" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5366 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1182275021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 6/19/2007 12:37:28 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, wrjjrs@aol.com writes: I've always wondered about this. Realizing that the P-port exhaust lets the unburnt fuel into the the exhaust to be burnt there and lost as a potential for power. What about a Renisis with the side port exhaust? Wouldn't a P-port Renisis not have this problem, and therefore possibly produce more power per GPH fuel flow over your typical 13B? Or am I missing the big picture.. I've always wondered this.. Jarrett Johnson I suspect (but do not know) that the overlap would be close to a stock early 13B. There would be an advantage to the side port over the peripheral exhaust. It would probably work just fine. Lynn E. Hanover ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. -------------------------------1182275021 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 6/19/2007 12:37:28 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,=20 wrjjrs@aol.com writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>I've=20 always wondered about this. Realizing that the P-port exhaust lets
the= =20 unburnt fuel into the the exhaust to be burnt there and lost as a=20
potential for power. What about a Renisis with the side port exhaust?=20
Wouldn't a P-port Renisis not have this problem, and therefore possibl= y=20
produce more power per GPH fuel flow over your typical 13B? Or am I=20
missing the big picture..

I've always wondered=20 this..

Jarrett Johnson
I suspect (but do not know) that the overlap would be close to a stock=20 early 13B.
 
There would be an advantage  to the side port over the peripheral=20 exhaust.
 
It would probably work just fine.
 
Lynn E. Hanover 



See what's free at AOL.com.
-------------------------------1182275021--