X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from misav10.sasknet.sk.ca ([142.165.20.174] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2111660 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:21:15 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=142.165.20.174; envelope-from=hjjohnson@sasktel.net Received: from bgmpomr1.sasknet.sk.ca ([142.165.72.22]) by misav10 with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:20:37 -0600 Received: from sasktel.net ([192.168.234.97]) by bgmpomr1.sasknet.sk.ca (SaskTel eMessaging Service) with ESMTP id <0JJW001Q186DZQ20@bgmpomr1.sasknet.sk.ca> for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:20:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.234.25] (Forwarded-For: [24.72.101.251]) by cgmail1.sasknet.sk.ca (mshttpd); Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:20:37 -0600 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:20:37 -0600 From: H & J Johnson Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Different Rotary Port configurations To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-id: <5c53ec7ce76.4677bc05@sasktel.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.20 (built Feb 27 2006) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal Hey Bill, it's been a while. So, in essense you should be able to negate the issue via intake and exhaust lengths. Sorta like a 2 stroke.. do we have any data to show exactly what that would be or is this more of a guess number? I remember Ed doing a trial w/ a variable length intake to solve this question but I don't remember the results. If a person could make it work it'd sure help I'm sure. Also, has anyone ever done anything like Kent Paser did w/ his Mustang II exhaust? [He wrote the book "Speed with Economy"] He put small cones in the end of the exhaust which bolted up to the block. The exhaust ran through these but because of their shape they would not allow a reflected wave to re-enter the port, this created a lower pressure exhaust which scavenged the cylinder better. He's flying w/ a 0-320 but the theory might work w/ a 13b? The Mill is coming along very well. I took the time to add a movable console on a track, mounted on the side of the machine. This will allow me to traverse the console down the length and save walking 30+ft each time I want to touch off a part. The wiring is done, w/ the exception of the 240vac plug on the end of the power cable [I couldn't find it last night at 11pm] and the limit switchs, which have the wire run, I just need to mount the switchs and wire them into the control [12 wires to connect ttl] I've had it running but took it down to install the console. [which took about 4 months longer than I planned.] As always, time is in short supply in the summer, I'm still working two jobs and getting ready for a new addition to the family in a month here so things just take longer than planned. Anyway I'm still working on getting a website up.. the last guy who was going to do it for me bailed so.. gotta find someone else :-) All in all.. I'm happy w/ it.. I just can't wait to start making parts w/ it.. d:-) Best Jarrett > > > Hi Jarrett, > How's the "big machine" install coming along? The key to the > overlap > problem is proper exhaust tuning. If the out flow of the exhaust > is > adaquate there will be very little cross flow. In fact the outflow > can > assist the intake. My "best" system would be direct injected so > there > wouldn't be any fuel in the intake charge. > Bill Jepson