In a message dated 6/18/2007 4:30:46 PM Pacific Standard Time,
eanderson@carolina.rr.com writes:
Renesis
will undoubtedly get a better specific fuel consumption than a
PP.
So for those that want the utmost in power, it sounds like
the PP is the
way to go. For other cheap old chaps the Renesis would
appear to offer a
cost effective power
increase.
Ed
Here Ed I have to totally DISagree. The side ported engine is used to
provide more power, and has bigger side ports only workable with the
Renesis, but must also pass smog regulations and provide low-end
torque for car use. The need for the higher redline is the total giveaway. For
ANY i.c.e. the key to higher bmep is higher RPM. Spin your 13B to 9k and provide
it with an adaquate intake and exhaust I would bet money you will be within a
few HP. While I don't want to sound like a broken record, and certainly not
trying to be contentious, Mazda built the 26B for use in a race using an economy
formula. If side ports were more efficient they would have used them!
P-ports make more power, but in the low to midrange so critical in a car they
are much dirtier on HC. I really believe that the Renesis came from Mazda's
hydrogen experiments. The ability to produce large ports WITH NO OVERLAP was
critical to the success of that project. Much talk has been made of the fact
that p-port rotaries have considerable overlap in the exhaust to intake phase.
So does every high performance piston engine ever built. Tuners have even found
the overlap phase to be beneficial to performance when the engine is properly
tuned. The reason for the renesis is IMHO the need to pass smog and provide
competitive power, Not that the Renesis is the "best" configuration. I'm glad
they're building it since it is the key to Rotary survival. I simply harbor no
delusions that Mazda wouldn't run a p-port with variable length intake tract if
smog and noise would allow it. The advent of truly functional Direct injection
may make the return of p-ports possible, but there is now a lot of inertia
against them.
As for cheaper I agree. Anything over-the-counter is a less
expensive solution!
Bill Jepson