X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imo-m21.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2096775 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:13:23 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.2; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-m21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.2.) id q.cae.123fa141 (52319) for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:12:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from WEBMAIL-MA11 (webmail-ma11.webmail.aol.com [64.12.88.75]) by ciaaol-d01.mail.aol.com (v115.17) with ESMTP id MAILCIAAOLD019-cc5f466d9082205; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:12:18 -0400 References: To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Spark Plug Cleaning Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:12:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: wrjjrs@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed X-Mailer: AOL WebMail 27618 Received: from 65.161.241.3 by WEBMAIL-MA11.sysops.aol.com (64.12.88.75) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:12:18 -0400 Message-Id: <8C97A6B2ED636F9-1A0-15FAD@WEBMAIL-MA11.sysops.aol.com> X-AOL-IP: 64.12.88.75 X-Spam-Flag: NO Totally agreed Ed, For your information my EAA chapter had a rep from Lycon, a top Lyc=20 engine builder on the west coast visit. He said that they had been=20 having some trouble with their "hopped up" Lycs. They surveyed avgas=20 locally (from San Jose to LA) and they said they were seeing WIDELY=20 varied formulations. The fuel was OK octane wise but the amounts of TEL=20 (lead) and other fuel additives were all over the map. He said that=20 auto fuel was far more consistent! In fact they will void your warranty=20 if you run LOP because they couldn't predict the results. This=20 evaluation would be consistent with wide variance in TBS. (time before=20 sag) Being totally honest I do not believe we will ever eliminate this=20 totally while running leaded fuels. 100LL has a rather higher lead=20 content than any auto fuel did. The problem is that the plugs tend to=20 have "tracking" rather than fouling. Lead deposits on the insulator=20 cause a lower resistance track or path to form on the surface of the=20 insulator. We saw this a lot on 2 strokes. The thing is the coil IS=20 firing the charge is moving along the path, there is no malfunction of=20 the coil. The tracked charge just doesn't ignite the fuel air charge=20 because the spark doesn't jump the gap. There have been loads of=20 research on ways to stop the problem. There are 2 ways that worked back=20 then, (mid-late 70s), high compression and unleaded fuel. I don't=20 understand the chemistry changes caused by high compression, and it=20 really isn't available to us anyway. Auto fuel provides us with the=20 best alternative. If you run 100LL buy your plugs in bulk and change=20 often. Bill Jepson -----Original Message----- From: Ed Anderson To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 9:10 am Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Spark Plug Cleaning Actually, that is what I do, Bill. In fact, you probably missed my e=20 mail which showed I could fly (changing plugs ever 25 hours) for over=20 300 hours before I approached the cost of the coils of the Blaster LS1=20 system.=A0 =A0 But, on the other hand, my experience has been the SAG interval may=20 vary from as little as 12 hours to as many as 30 hours. The fact that=20 SAG tend to happen mostly in high power regimes of flight (like in take=20 off) can cause a bit of consternation in some situations. Having had it=20 happened on both rotors during take off it reduced my ROC to 500 fpm.=20 Not really dangerous - unless you are facing a hill or obstruction- but=20 not really pleasant either.=A0 =A0 Also, the SAG can be mistaken for other difficulties - I spent weeks=20 thinking I had an injector problem when I first encountered it.=A0 =A0 So while (after 10 years of doing so), I can attest that changing plugs=20 is certainly a viable alternative (given the relative cheapness of auto=20 spark plugs), it would be nice just to be able to eliminate SAG all=20 together.=A0 =A0 Just my personal opinion, of course.=A0 =A0 Ed=A0 =A0 ----- Original Message ----- From: =A0 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" =A0 Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 10:36 AM=A0 Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Spark Plug Cleaning=A0 =A0 =A0 There is all this discussion about other ignitions and other methods to=A0 keep the plugs fresh. Would I be out of line if I just suggested that=A0 we change them more often? You can change a lot of standard plugs for=A0 the price of most ignition upgrades. I would also like to mention that=A0 Kawasaki did a check on various types of plug cleaning. Their=A0 conclusion was that there was no economical way to clean plugs that=A0 worked. They did some chemical cleans that worked, but cost more=A0 overall than new plugs! My guess is that modern eco activism being what=A0 it is in California I probably couldn't buy the stuff anyway.=A0 Bill Jepson=A0 =A0 -----Original Message-----=A0 From: Ernest Christley =A0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft =A0 Sent: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 6:37 am=A0 Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Spark Plug Cleaning=A0 =A0 Michael LaFleur wrote:=A0 > Sure. How much do you spend building an airplane? $400 is what, 1/2%=20 or > so?=A0 You guys and your fancy kit airplanes...=A0 $400 is more like 2% for some of us.=A0 =A0 > An extra $400 is keeping you from having a reliable ignition system.=A0 $400 or a proper maintenance schedule will net the same reliability.=A0 >=A0 > Put off buying those ANR headsets and rid yourself the risk of SAG >=A0 during climbout or a go-round. We're talking real pucker factor here.=A0 >=A0 > Mike LaFleur=A0 =A0 I wouldn't pay $400 for headsets, either; but, that isn't the point.=A0 The point is that $400 IS a lot of money, and that is a separate=A0 question that whether it is justified or not.=A0 Planes get expensive in the same way they get heavy...one pound at a=A0 time...which would be such a profound statement if we were British.=A0 System after expensive system is piled on, justified in each case by an=A0 obscure what-happens-if scenario. Meanwhile, where we started gives us=A0 more performance than the typical 152 most of us did our primary=A0 training in. I believe I've read that the training fleet is one of the=A0 safest components of the GA fleet. IMNSHO, over the lifetime of the=A0 coils, the $400 would be better spend on an extra couple hours of=A0 recurrency training with a good instructor.=A0 =A0 -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=A0 Archive and UnSub:=A0 http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html=A0 =A0 ________________________________________________________________________=A0 AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free=A0 from AOL at AOL.com.=A0 =3D0=A0 =A0 --=A0 Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=A0 Archive and UnSub:=20 http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html =A0 --=A0 Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=A0 Archive and UnSub:=20 http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html=A0 ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free=20 from AOL at AOL.com. =3D0