X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-01.southeast.rr.com ([24.25.9.100] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2096153 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:33:23 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.100; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-103-061.carolina.res.rr.com [24.74.103.61]) by ms-smtp-01.southeast.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l5BCWXh1006783 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:32:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000901c7ac25$3894ed00$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: RV-7A cooling - continued Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:37:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Hi Dennis, Yes, had 3 grandsons over yesterday myself - so I understand distraction {:>) Yes, going to more H20 probably helps more than just about anything -well, more air flow also helps. The normally 50/50 has a Cp of around 0.8 where as water of course is 1.0 or a 20% improvement right there. But, then you have to remember to put it back to 50/50 come winter time. Texas gets cold as best I remember. Several folks have tried cowl flaps with less than overwhelming success. Not certain why they do not seem to used more - they, of course, do add complexity and a small bit of weight. In my opinion, they get to be a real hassle trying to put them in to a nose gear aircraft - not so much in a tail dragger with more room under the lower bottom cowl. I can tell when OAT changes by more than 2 -3 degrees F just by how my cooling temps are running. So you're on the money about relatively small changes having bigger impact on liquid cooled installations. I believe that driving a bit more air to your oil cooler will pay dividends. Best Regards Ed Ed Anderson Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dennis Haverlah" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 11:32 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: RV-7A cooling - continued > Sorry the pictures were not attached - I got distracted - 5 grand kids > descended on us for the evening. I'll send the pictures Monday. Your > idea for a vertical plate to divert more air from the water and to the oil > may be the ticket. Also I'm using about 50% water and antifreeze, I'll > change to 10 % antifreeze, 90 % water and a teaspoon to a tablespoon of > liquid soap to help lower the water temps more. We have plenty of 95 + > degree days here in the summer! Air cooled engines have a big advantage > because the cylinders can run 450 deg F and the delta T between the > cylinder and fins is much higher. A 10 degree change in max. temp due to > ambient temps going up is not nearly as critical for them as compared to > us when we are trying to control temps at 200 to 215 deg F. I'm surpassed > cowl flaps are not standard issue on rotary A/C. I may have to add them > in the future to enhance full power climb cooling. > > Dennis H. > UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html