X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from smtp112.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.229.93] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with SMTP id 2095317 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:42:27 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.229.93; envelope-from=downing.j@sbcglobal.net Received: (qmail 37016 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2007 21:41:35 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=AlWde3e9YjsuDlzMp5YqJ+0t2mTgsKIIW78YM6+1OFexX/TYew4NvnJq3XDHr06jlqDPF+a54BcKCp1iH0zwnOOMrknc4gOKOEEo1z5EeuA2f+/f6Dg2ldVPbadgUAhSBSi32rYa2h+SvsI1TAfcSOFgolFQP4KVkrq2WYzabDU= ; Received: from unknown (HELO mom) (downing.j@sbcglobal.net@75.41.20.141 with login) by smtp112.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jun 2007 21:41:35 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 0K5ndTgVM1mZB7Xs.9exXwUm_jJJbKu2S.sZ6eTDpiNVkC0S4keF0l83jtMMWXb8_fHvKyKfGUjeIdK.KafmtwXEgDE.DLqcDVUNxR4BK4hbAbeg1bSvn9Dh2nZdx1HgwgSRfKosqw_TkJ8- Message-ID: <000a01c7aba8$66e83d60$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> From: "John Downing" To: "flyrotary" Subject: Fiberfrax gasket Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:43:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C7AB86.DF71E820" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C7AB86.DF71E820 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It was mentioned a while back that fiberfrax was used on each side of = the copper gasket. I have a used copper gasket (turbo) and the question = is, if the fiberfrax will take the exhaust abuse on each side of the = copper gasket with out the protection of a copper liner, why not use = fiberfrax, .0125" as the sole gasket. JohnD Working on SS tunnel = liner backed with fiberfrax to protect fabric from exhaust. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C7AB86.DF71E820 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

It was mentioned a while back that = fiberfrax was=20 used on each side of the copper gasket. I have a used copper = gasket=20 (turbo) and the question is, if the fiberfrax will take the exhaust = abuse on=20 each side of the copper gasket with out the protection of a copper = liner, why=20 not use fiberfrax, .0125" as the sole gasket. = JohnD =20 Working on SS tunnel liner backed with fiberfrax to protect fabric from=20 exhaust.

------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C7AB86.DF71E820--