Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #37559
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: BSHP Approach was [FlyRotary] Re: PP Ve??? was Re: Intake CFM air flow
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 17:06:28 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Thanks, Blake.  I missed that point. 
 
 I did find one minor error in your transcription of your example to e mail - a digit was dropped. I  also used 10700 rpm as Lynn reported vice the 10000 rpm in you example.
 
With that using your approach (which is certainly simpler and more accurate than the one I used) I came up with 110.19% VE  which would appear to give a PP a VE in the vicinity of  110% Ve.
 
  But, again, it would be nice to know if there were any restrictors or if that was clean and clear intake. 
 
Lynn?
 
Ed
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: "Blake Lewis" <blake.lewis@gmail.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 4:35 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: PP Ve??? was Re: Intake CFM air flow

> 12A  Pports can do 310 HP at 10,700 RPM at .667
>
> If the .667 is BSFC then start with that.
> density of air at sea level 15C = .0765 lbs/cf
> air/fuel = 12
>
> .667 bsfc x 310hp is 206.77 lbs/hr fuel
>
> 206.77lbs x 12 = 2481.24 lbs/hr air
>
> 2481.24 lbs/hr  /  60min/hr = 41.354 lbs/min
>
> (41.354 lbs/min)  / (.0765 lbs/cf) * (1728 ci/cf) = 93411 ci /min  =  934113.  Dropped a digit in transcription to e mail.
>
> (93411ci/min) / (10000 rev/min) = 93.41 ci/rev 
 
   (934113 ci/min)/(10700 rev/min) = 87.300 ci/rev,  I used the 10700 rpm Lynn cited in his example
>
> 1300cc / (2.54cm * 2.54cm * 2.54cm)/ci = 79.33 ci volume
>
> 93.41ci / 79.33ci = 1.1774 = 117.74 % VE
 
using the Ci/rev I got with 10700 rpm and 310 HP I arrived at
 
87.33 ci/79.22 ci = 110.19 % VE
 
Good calculation approach, I'll save it for later use

>
> Blake
>
>
> On 6/1/07, Ed Anderson <
eanderson@carolina.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 12A  Pports can do 310 HP at 10,700 RPM at .667 .
>>
>> Lynn E. Hanover
>>
>>
>> Thanks for that Data point, Lynn.  I see if I can use it to get a gestimate
>> on PP Ve.
>>
>>  So if a 12A is 73 cubic inches then at 10700 rpm and 100%Ve it would flow
>>
>> 73*10700/(1728) =   452 CFM air flow.
>>
>>  So if at this 100% Ve we get less power than 310HP then we can assume the
>> Ve of the 12A must be greater than 100%Ve to give us more power.
>>
>> At sea level standard day 1 cubic foot of air = 0.076 lbms.  So for that
>> flow we would have 0.076 * 452 =  34.35 lbs/min.   Now I don't have any idea
>> what Air Fuel ratio a rotary racer uses but I best power is reportedly to
>> close to 12:1
>>
>>  Assuming a race air fuel ratio of around 12:1 then the fuel needed for that
>> ratio at that airflow.  Then  the fuel needed would be 34.35 /12 :=  2.8624
>> lb of gasoline per minute.
>>
>>   A lb of gasoline has 19000 BTU depending on octane.  Higher octane has
>> less  so assuming 19000 BTU/Lbm gasoline, we can next calculate the power
>> being produced in the engine.
>>
>> Converting 2.8624lb/min of gasoline into lb/sec we have 2.8624/60 = 0.047708
>> lb/sec.
>>
>> To find the BTU we have .048*19000 = 912 BTU/sec. IF ALL this energy were
>> converted to torque it would give  912 *778 = 709536 ft-lbs of torque.  or
>> divide by 550 = 1290 HP!!!
>>
>> Unfortunately, we know approx 50% goes out the tail pipe as heat and another
>> 25% (more or less) is Waste heat rejected by our coolers leaving us
>> somewhere around 25-30% depending on whose estimate you use for efficiency
>> of a rotary engine of  1290 *.25 = 322 HP or using 30% 1290 *.30 = 387 HP
>>
>>
>> Hummm, since the 12A PP is producing 310, but the calculations shows it
>> should be getting closer to 322 HP that would suggest a PP port 12A flows
>> less than 100% Ve.  If fact, it would suggest that the Ve of the 12A at
>> 10700 rpm is closer to 310/322 *100 = 96.27%Ve.
>>
>> But, this is instantaneous BHP,  I have not subtracted for mechanical or
>> other inefficiencies so taking a guess that amounts to around 5% of the
>> total.  Then to get a dyno of 310 HP the engine would need to produce
>> 310*1.05 = 325 HP.  So here we would get 325/322 =  101% Ve for the 12A at
>> 10700 rpm.
>>
>> Given we know that some racers are restricted by the size of the intakes
>> permitted (is this true for the PP, Lynn?) perhaps that is why the VE seems
>> a bit on the low side.  But, that's just a guess.  Well, that was my best
>> crack at trying to determine the efficiency of a PP.
>>
>> So anybody else having an idea or source of information or opinion - jump
>> in.
>>
>> Ed
>
> --
> Homepage: 
http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster