X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.177] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2079162 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:36:26 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.146.177; envelope-from=blake.lewis@gmail.com Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v33so1693042wah for ; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:35:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rprciEkDO3BqZuzKWgiLQXD5gqZryOUJrZjv1HEaHRFz1MqFCPWMbMGOcrHvbyV86xLqPrDn7/rN0Hsbq8b+WaTaKhmVr8GOIk9ozINXrYYbtFANybviIYkRlVgueEn0wv8RWYz7xSu7NcbLRrzFwx1/EWxE4jY3X815+shMQBM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nqJMSfAWD+GFWHeValnh2S9bo72TaJefOoQsfG3arX9Cc600akoUpMY2ChYo+eEB5KN7fr23kr23vCV/iP1vaX0Xy4WW7qB5cqJWFaHMw7l43egqJsIsfF61rAHB04/ilCpWdMBWe7OwrjiM4ZuCwOnhF8G33+rRNpXL1x47NxA= Received: by 10.114.149.2 with SMTP id w2mr2211532wad.1180730148724; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.43.4 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:35:48 -0500 From: "Blake Lewis" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] PP Ve??? was Re: Intake CFM air flow In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: 12A Pports can do 310 HP at 10,700 RPM at .667 If the .667 is BSFC then start with that. density of air at sea level 15C = .0765 lbs/cf air/fuel = 12 .667 bsfc x 310hp is 206.77 lbs/hr fuel 206.77lbs x 12 = 2481.24 lbs/hr air 2481.24 lbs/hr / 60min/hr = 41.354 lbs/min (41.354 lbs/min) / (.0765 lbs/cf) * (1728 ci/cf) = 93411 ci /min (93411ci/min) / (10000 rev/min) = 93.41 ci/rev 1300cc / (2.54cm * 2.54cm * 2.54cm)/ci = 79.33 ci volume 93.41ci / 79.33ci = 1.1774 = 117.74 % VE Blake On 6/1/07, Ed Anderson wrote: > > > > > 12A Pports can do 310 HP at 10,700 RPM at .667 . > > Lynn E. Hanover > > > Thanks for that Data point, Lynn. I see if I can use it to get a gestimate > on PP Ve. > > So if a 12A is 73 cubic inches then at 10700 rpm and 100%Ve it would flow > > 73*10700/(1728) = 452 CFM air flow. > > So if at this 100% Ve we get less power than 310HP then we can assume the > Ve of the 12A must be greater than 100%Ve to give us more power. > > At sea level standard day 1 cubic foot of air = 0.076 lbms. So for that > flow we would have 0.076 * 452 = 34.35 lbs/min. Now I don't have any idea > what Air Fuel ratio a rotary racer uses but I best power is reportedly to > close to 12:1 > > Assuming a race air fuel ratio of around 12:1 then the fuel needed for that > ratio at that airflow. Then the fuel needed would be 34.35 /12 := 2.8624 > lb of gasoline per minute. > > A lb of gasoline has 19000 BTU depending on octane. Higher octane has > less so assuming 19000 BTU/Lbm gasoline, we can next calculate the power > being produced in the engine. > > Converting 2.8624lb/min of gasoline into lb/sec we have 2.8624/60 = 0.047708 > lb/sec. > > To find the BTU we have .048*19000 = 912 BTU/sec. IF ALL this energy were > converted to torque it would give 912 *778 = 709536 ft-lbs of torque. or > divide by 550 = 1290 HP!!! > > Unfortunately, we know approx 50% goes out the tail pipe as heat and another > 25% (more or less) is Waste heat rejected by our coolers leaving us > somewhere around 25-30% depending on whose estimate you use for efficiency > of a rotary engine of 1290 *.25 = 322 HP or using 30% 1290 *.30 = 387 HP > > > Hummm, since the 12A PP is producing 310, but the calculations shows it > should be getting closer to 322 HP that would suggest a PP port 12A flows > less than 100% Ve. If fact, it would suggest that the Ve of the 12A at > 10700 rpm is closer to 310/322 *100 = 96.27%Ve. > > But, this is instantaneous BHP, I have not subtracted for mechanical or > other inefficiencies so taking a guess that amounts to around 5% of the > total. Then to get a dyno of 310 HP the engine would need to produce > 310*1.05 = 325 HP. So here we would get 325/322 = 101% Ve for the 12A at > 10700 rpm. > > Given we know that some racers are restricted by the size of the intakes > permitted (is this true for the PP, Lynn?) perhaps that is why the VE seems > a bit on the low side. But, that's just a guess. Well, that was my best > crack at trying to determine the efficiency of a PP. > > So anybody else having an idea or source of information or opinion - jump > in. > > Ed