Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #37473
From: Bill Schertz <wschertz@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Evans Coolant
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:31:04 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Ed,
Your comments are "right on".
Bill Schertz
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 10:58 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Evans Coolant

I have mentioned several times in discussions regarding the EVANS coolant
that to really gain benefits from its use that the coolant flow would have to be increased to ensure the removal of adequate heat from the engine.  The fact that the EVANS has a 300F+ boiling point may delay "boil over" but it does little to protect our rotary's because they are cooked long before that point is reached.  In fact, the 250F boil over of the 50/50 mixture pretty much ensures that if you reach those temps you have probably cooked your engine.  However, preventing Boil-over (as Al Wick has mentioned) is a worthwhile consideration.
 
But, all that aside, my point was that give the lower specific heat and the fact that the rotary engine is more constrained temperature wise-  means that to flow the same amount of heat out of your engine per unit time with Evans - you MUST increase the coolant flow rate.  IF you do increase the flow rate with Evans to the point that the coolant temperatures are within the limits for the rotary then you stand a much better chance of benefiting from using EVANS.
 
I happen to notice in reading material on the EVANS coolant, that the above point is also made by them:  This is a direct quote from material on their web site.
 
"THE EVANS SYSTEM

Since the Evans coolant possesses different flow and thermal characteristics than normal EGW, some changes are in order. First, there is no need to use a pressurized cooling system, but an overflow bottle is necessary due to the expansion rate of the coolant. Evans markets 0- and 4-lb. caps for most radiators. The low-pressure cap is used to keep coolant loss in check on late-model engines. To totally optimize this system, a high-flow Evans water pump, thermostat and radiator should be installed. Working with data from the field, most late-model performance cars, unless approaching the 650-hp level, can reap substantial performance gains with just the installation of  the Evans coolant and high-flow thermostat. Realizing the huge potential for power generation through the use of this coolant, Evans has designed many ancillary components to maximize the potential for late-model fuel-injected engines. Pulleys to increase stock water pump speeds, water pump application for TPl, 5.0s and Buick GNs along with radiators.  "

Note the reference to late-model performance cars is a reference to the fact  that these newer engines are designed for and operate at higher coolant temperatures (more fuel efficiency)  than previous engines (or our rotary engines).
 
The point is as EVANS points out - there are some definite benefits to EVANs.  However to gain the maximum benefit and given our rotary's lower temperature limits, I personally believe these changes  are essential if you want a system that keeps you engine within safe limits. 
 
The changes Evan's mentions  include high flow pumps, pulleys for faster flow, high flow thermostat and high flow radiators.  This implies (to me at least) that if you are going to use Evans then you need to design your coolant system for its use from the git-go.
 
My trouble-making 0.02 {:>)
 
Ed
 
 
 
 
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster