X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imf00aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.48] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2074785 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 30 May 2007 11:47:09 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.48; envelope-from=rusty@radrotary.com Received: from ibm65aec.bellsouth.net ([65.6.194.9]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070530124630.TFK22524.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm65aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Wed, 30 May 2007 08:46:30 -0400 Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by ibm65aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070530124630.MTKI22805.ibm65aec.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Wed, 30 May 2007 08:46:30 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: First Start... Well... Not Quite.. Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 07:46:31 -0500 Message-ID: <005101c7a2b8$8c7be340$6e01a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0052_01C7A28E.A3A5DB40" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6822 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Importance: Normal Thread-Index: AceitSBqfeJw+g6TSQ2DdDDXYDdi7gAAlvtQ In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0052_01C7A28E.A3A5DB40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Have you tried the injector simulation test to see if the injectors are working? =20 =20 How long has this feature been in the EC-2? I was thinking this was a = new addition, so most people still wouldn't have it??? I've sure never = known about it until recently, and I made a note to try mine to see if this = works. =20 I would vote for fuel as well, though I'd also recheck the CAS as Ed mentioned. If you did that much cranking, some with cold start on, = you'd have to smell fuel in the exhaust if your injectors were working. =20 =20 As for fuel pressure, what size is your fuel return line to the tanks? = Most people get a couple psi increase with the second pump. To get as much = as you have, I'm thinking the fuel return can't flow enough to return the volume from both pumps at once. This isn't necessarily something that = has to be fixed though. =20 =20 Good luck, Rusty ------=_NextPart_000_0052_01C7A28E.A3A5DB40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Have you tried the injector simulation test to see if the injectors = are=20 working?   
 
How long has=20 this feature been in the EC-2?  I was thinking this was a new=20 addition, so most people still wouldn't have it???  I've sure never = known=20 about it until recently, and I made a note to try mine to see if this=20 works. 
 
I would vote=20 for fuel as well, though I'd also recheck the CAS as Ed = mentioned.  =20 If you did that much cranking, some with cold start on, you'd have = to smell=20 fuel in the exhaust if your injectors were=20 working.   
 
As for fuel=20 pressure, what size is your fuel return line to the tanks?  Most = people get=20 a couple psi increase with the second pump.  To get as much as you = have,=20 I'm thinking the fuel return can't flow enough to return the volume from = both=20 pumps at once.  This isn't necessarily something that has to be = fixed=20 though. 
 
Good=20 luck,
Rusty
------=_NextPart_000_0052_01C7A28E.A3A5DB40--