X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 73 [XX] (60%) RECEIVED: Received headers not consistent with Juno "FROM:" (40%) URL: contains host with port number Return-Path: Received: from m12.lax.untd.com ([64.136.30.75] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with SMTP id 2066087 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 May 2007 18:50:17 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.136.30.75; envelope-from=alwick@juno.com Received: from m12.lax.untd.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by m12.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABDFNFVGARBKSWJ for (sender ); Thu, 24 May 2007 15:49:10 -0700 (PDT) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: L941HVjjYzDhN3itp//mkIC88dtfjuopM01zwBUaCFazBACcgjn8iw== Received: (from alwick@juno.com) by m12.lax.untd.com (jqueuemail) id MNJTGJLR; Thu, 24 May 2007 15:48:10 PDT To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 15:34:31 -0700 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: intake tubing Message-ID: <20070524.154737.2396.6.alwick@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 5.0.49 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 1-5,7-67,69,71-72 From: al p wick X-ContentStamp: 26:13:3201290800 X-MAIL-INFO:0c6871ec413c49284529b84941e165e1cdd82939e19de96cbd5841813d71352cb981b831f52828119d5c0509a9bc980d18a9488888e918f869c1b5f1ddf15d8c2d2d0c21bd4c8d293c2c0c492cf959e5b1fc2cecc59ca121ecfcb1ec35ec45080578e92dd50c7d0c19216df995a56d8dbd99 X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 127.0.0.1|localhost|m12.lax.untd.com|alwick@juno.com A lot of the new vehicles have plastic intake. My new engine does. Not sure if that helps. Intake weights 7 lbs or so. -al wick On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:14:15 -0400 "Joe Berki" writes: > Has any one made an intake from composite? I thought Ed did but I am > not > sure on the limitations. Does the fuel/air mix pose a threat to > the > integrity of a composite intake? Backfire? Combustible? For those of > us that > built their airframes from composite it might be easier than > welding. Just > a thought. > > Joe Berki > Limo EZ > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:09 AM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: intake tubing > > > > Thanks all for your comments. I really do appreciate it. This list > is by > far the best rotary list around. I'm not so sure I want to drill > holes in my > engine to make a Paul-Port looks like I will be going with the > Mistral > intake, if I can get Francoise to answere my e-mail. I think he is a > bit > busy these days. Anyway thanks for the reality check. I'll get back > to > sanding and filling and sanding and so on and so on. If I have > anymore > bright ideas I'll let you guys in on it straight away. > > > > Tony > > > > -- > > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.8.0/817 - Release Date: > 5/24/2007 > 4:01 PM > > > > > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > -al wick Cozy IV powered by Turbo Subaru 3.0R with variable valve lift and cam timing. Artificial intelligence in cockpit, N9032U 240+ hours from Portland, Oregon Glass panel design, Subaru install, Prop construct, Risk assessment info: http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html