X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 10 [X] Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.241.39] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2065442 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 May 2007 12:52:26 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.39; envelope-from=tonyslongez@cox.net Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070524165147.GIKB12190.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Thu, 24 May 2007 12:51:47 -0400 Received: from fed1wml08.mgt.cox.net ([172.18.180.10]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id 34rn1X0020DrMWL0000000; Thu, 24 May 2007 12:51:47 -0400 Received: from 72.193.240.142 by webmail.west.cox.net; Thu, 24 May 2007 12:51:46 -0400 Message-ID: <5834498.1180025506976.JavaMail.root@fed1wml08.mgt.cox.net> Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 9:51:46 -0700 From: To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: intake tubing Cc: wrjjrs@aol.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sensitivity: Normal ---- wrjjrs@aol.com wrote: > > Tony, > > The sad part here is that is IS a good idea. A good idea by itself though isn't necessarily comercially viable. > > Bill Jepson > > Bill I think you are right unfortunately all of the intake manifolds I have seen are sand cast aluminum. Which can be very heavy. I just thought that an extruted oval port tubing welded to a plate would be impressively lite. The problem here is not the money to make the tooling and get the extrusion, the problem is the minimum order. I can't have 300lbs of extruded aluminum tubing sitting in my garage my wife will hange me. Not to mention I have no room for that. What I may do is send the tubing to Wolf Aircraft they'll stock it there and then when someone needs it bent they can bend it however you want it. There I go again with my bright ideas. Tony