X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 57 [XX] (57%) URL: contains host with port number (43%) HEADERS: MIME content-type header doesn't contain charset information Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.116] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2065303 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 May 2007 11:35:53 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.131.116; envelope-from=keltro@att.net Received: from mwebmail24.att.net ([204.127.135.63]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with SMTP id <2007052415350411200dascoe>; Thu, 24 May 2007 15:35:15 +0000 Received: from [64.250.199.220] by mwebmail24.att.net; Thu, 24 May 2007 15:35:04 +0000 From: keltro@att.net (Kelly Troyer) To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] intake tubing Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 15:35:04 +0000 Message-Id: <052420071535.9146.4655B0A7000C5419000023BA2160376223019D9B040A05@att.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Mar 24 2007) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VsdHJvQGF0dC5uZXQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_9146_1180020904_0" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_9146_1180020904_0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Tony, I think there is a definite need for these tubes!! I say go for it !! -- Kelly Troyer "Dyke Delta"_13B ROTARY Engine "RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2 "Mistral"_Backplate/Oil Manifold -------------- Original message from : -------------- > Does everyone understand what it is I'm trying to do with this intake tubing or > am I speaking greek? I'm so tired of P.L. and his inebriated remarks. I swear he > is on a binge right now. > > Do we as a rotory community not need this type of lite weight aluminum tubing > that is perfectly matched to our ports? I thought one of the big obstacals was > our intake manifolds have things changed and I wasn't aware? OR is everyone > happy with using a Paul -Port. Which by the way talking to Dave at Mazdatrix > revealed several inconsistencies in his P-port reporting. > > This whole thing started becasue I can't find a manifold that isn't a chunk of > extruded hunk of aluminum that weighs more than my car. > Seems easy enought to just weld four tubes of the correct size to an aluminum > plate. and that is it. We can mandral bend them have them straight what ever. I > guess I'm surprized by the groups reaction or lack of. > > Tony > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_9146_1180020904_0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Tony,

I think there is a definite need for these tubes!! I say go for it !!

--
Kelly Troyer
"Dyke Delta"_13B ROTARY Engine
"RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2
"Mistral"_Backplate/Oil Manifold

-------------- Original message from <tonyslongez@cox.net>: --------------

> Does everyone understand what it is I'm trying to do with this intake tubing or
> am I speaking greek? I'm so tired of P.L. and his inebriated remarks. I swear he
> is on a binge right now.
>
> Do we as a rotory community not need this type of lite weight aluminum tubing
> that is perfectly matched to our ports? I thought one of the big obstacals was
> our intake manifolds have things changed and I wasn't aware? OR is everyone
> happy with using a Paul -Port. Which by the way talking to Dave at Mazdatrix
> revealed several inconsistencies in his P-port reporting.
>
> This whole thing started becasue I can't find a manifold that isn't a chunk of
> extruded hunk of aluminum that weighs more than my car.
> Seems easy en ought to just weld four tubes of the correct size to an aluminum
> plate. and that is it. We can mandral bend them have them straight what ever. I
> guess I'm surprized by the groups reaction or lack of.
>
> Tony
>
> --
> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html

--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_9146_1180020904_0--