X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 50 [XX] (67%) URL: contains host with port number (33%) BODY: text/html email has no html tag Return-Path: Received: from imo-d21.mx.aol.com ([205.188.144.207] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2065149 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 May 2007 10:07:27 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.144.207; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-d21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.2.) id q.ce4.116101bb (52370) for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 10:06:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mblk-d40 (mblk-d40.mblk.aol.com [205.188.212.224]) by ciaaol-m01.mx.aol.com (v115.11) with ESMTP id MAILCIAAOLM018-cc9246559beb1d9; Thu, 24 May 2007 10:06:35 -0400 References: To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: intake tubing Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:06:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: wrjjrs@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8C96C23DF8E468F_868_105F_mblk-d40.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL WebMail 27384 Received: from 65.161.241.3 by mblk-d40.sysops.aol.com (205.188.212.224) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Thu, 24 May 2007 10:06:35 -0400 Message-Id: <8C96C23DF8E468F-868-86D@mblk-d40.sysops.aol.com> X-AOL-IP: 205.188.212.224 X-Spam-Flag: NO ----------MB_8C96C23DF8E468F_868_105F_mblk-d40.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Tony, The sad part here is that is IS a good idea. A good idea by itself though isn't necessarily comercially viable. Bill Jepson -----Original Message----- From: tonyslongez@cox.net To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Thu, 24 May 2007 1:09 am Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: intake tubing Thanks all for your comments. I really do appreciate it. This list is by far the best rotary list around. I'm not so sure I want to drill holes in my engine to make a Paul-Port looks like I will be going with the Mistral intake, if I can get Francoise to answere my e-mail. I think he is a bit busy these days. Anyway thanks for the reality check. I'll get back to sanding and filling and sanding and so on and so on. If I have anymore bright ideas I'll let you guys in on it straight away. Tony -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. ----------MB_8C96C23DF8E468F_868_105F_mblk-d40.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Tony,
The sad part here is that is IS a good idea. A good idea by itself though isn't necessarily comercially viable.
Bill Jepson


-----Original Message-----
From: tonyslongez@cox.net
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Sent: Thu, 24 May 2007 1:09 am
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: intake tubing

Thanks all for your comments. I really do appreciate it. This list is by far the 
best rotary list around. I'm not so sure I want to drill holes in my engine to 
make a Paul-Port looks like I will be going with the Mistral intake, if I can 
get Francoise to answere my e-mail. I think he is a bit busy these days. Anyway 
thanks for the reality check. I'll get back to sanding and filling and sanding 
and so on and so on. If I have anymore bright ideas I'll let you guys in on it 
straight away. 

Tony

--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html

AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.
----------MB_8C96C23DF8E468F_868_105F_mblk-d40.sysops.aol.com--