X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
X-SpamCatcher-Score:  50 [XX]
 (67%)	URL: contains host with port number
 (33%)	BODY: text/html email has no html tag
Return-Path: <msteitle@gmail.com>
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.246] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9)
  with ESMTP id 2064194 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 23 May 2007 21:34:28 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.132.246; envelope-from=msteitle@gmail.com
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b2so107682ana
        for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 23 May 2007 18:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=g3rlESEuck1WUVCrlPi7rMKnNJU344yuC1muMhFv2R1X8scRlptcAIyU2xGXa1aR0M88aBYs1BKhbbqVS+I7T54LzEGmfxahbD9B3DmvtWgdy5YSRWw4o/5luDYl+ynF25oilYFPEy98XPuqsebV8/mad+kYc9e/wyk3zOix7js=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=tp95VCWBhpZGubdLLAVCi0Bw/c08K01WNpurDwhH10UygkswVYEj55RvIah2Qf3kHExg/cjDQkOUWGx4M2ttX3syvEWfbNPfCVv/ffyaxQwm0wOqs9rPRD9SY982MUtOkMWtkeh4QYT9Qwl7PGpwX3W1tLUZJbD2ma8MYkhIaNM=
Received: by 10.100.216.3 with SMTP id o3mr1188758ang.1179970433248;
        Wed, 23 May 2007 18:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.174.8 with HTTP; Wed, 23 May 2007 18:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5cf132c0705231833scf7f9e3g6edfda7e45b39275@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 20:33:53 -0500
From: "Mark Steitle" <msteitle@gmail.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] intake tubing
In-Reply-To: <list-2064067@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_167462_20958388.1179970433192"
References: <list-2064067@logan.com>

------=_Part_167462_20958388.1179970433192
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Tony,

Just speaking for myself, I haven't responded because I've already fought
the fight on the intake.  I hope I never have to build another intake.  But,
for those who have yet to tackle this task, your oval-to-round adapters
should make things much easier.  Maybe you could also have some flanges cut
for the more popular engines and sell kits.  Leave the final details to the
builder.

Mark S.


On 5/23/07, tonyslongez@cox.net <tonyslongez@cox.net> wrote:
>
> Does everyone understand what it is I'm trying to do with this intake
> tubing or am I speaking greek? I'm so tired of P.L. and his inebriated
> remarks. I swear he is on a binge right now.
>
> Do we as a rotory community not need this type of lite weight aluminum
> tubing that is perfectly matched to our ports? I thought one of the big
> obstacals was our intake manifolds have things changed and I wasn't aware?
> OR is everyone happy with using a Paul -Port. Which by the way talking to
> Dave at Mazdatrix revealed several inconsistencies in his P-port reporting.
>
> This whole thing started becasue I can't find a manifold that isn't a
> chunk of extruded hunk of aluminum that weighs more than my car.
> Seems easy enought to just weld four tubes of the correct size to an
> aluminum plate. and that is it. We can mandral bend them have them straight
> what ever. I guess I'm surprized by the groups reaction or lack of.
>
> Tony
>
> --
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:
> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>

------=_Part_167462_20958388.1179970433192
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<div>Tony, </div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Just speaking for myself, I haven&#39;t responded because I&#39;ve already fought the fight on the intake.&nbsp; I hope I never have to build another intake.&nbsp; But, for those who have yet to tackle this task, your oval-to-round adapters should make things much easier.&nbsp; Maybe you could also have some flanges cut for the more popular engines and sell kits.&nbsp; Leave the final details to the builder.
</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Mark S.&nbsp; <br><br>&nbsp;</div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/23/07, <b class="gmail_sendername"><a href="mailto:tonyslongez@cox.net">tonyslongez@cox.net</a></b> &lt;<a href="mailto:tonyslongez@cox.net">tonyslongez@cox.net</a>&gt; wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Does everyone understand what it is I&#39;m trying to do with this intake tubing or am I speaking greek? I&#39;m so tired of 
P.L. and his inebriated remarks. I swear he is on a binge right now.<br><br>Do we as a rotory community not need this type of lite weight aluminum tubing that is perfectly matched to our ports? I thought one of the big obstacals was our intake manifolds have things changed and I wasn&#39;t aware? OR is everyone happy with using a Paul -Port. Which by the way talking to Dave at Mazdatrix revealed several inconsistencies in his P-port reporting.
<br><br>This whole thing started becasue I can&#39;t find a manifold that isn&#39;t a chunk of extruded hunk of aluminum that weighs more than my car.<br>Seems easy enought to just weld four tubes of the correct size to an aluminum plate. and that is it. We can mandral bend them have them straight what ever. I guess I&#39;m surprized by the groups reaction or lack of.
<br><br>Tony<br><br>--<br>Homepage:&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="http://www.flyrotary.com/">http://www.flyrotary.com/</a><br>Archive and UnSub:&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html">http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_167462_20958388.1179970433192--