X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 73 [XX] (40%) URL: contains host with port number (40%) BODY: contains "rx" (20%) HEADERS: mail has MS Outlook properties but missing "Outlook" in "X-Mailer" Headers Return-Path: Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net ([63.240.77.82] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2064105 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 23 May 2007 20:21:57 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=63.240.77.82; envelope-from=wschertz@comcast.net Received: from wschertzpc (c-24-7-194-231.hsd1.il.comcast.net[24.7.194.231]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <2007052400212001200irqaje>; Thu, 24 May 2007 00:21:20 +0000 Message-ID: From: "Bill Schertz" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] intake tubing Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 19:21:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16386 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16386 Tony, I have to admit that I have not gone to the Dr. Gas site, so this comment may be off-base. The ports are oval in the vertical direction, but if the intent is to have the manifold bend over the top of the engine, the bend needs to be in the horizontal direction. Or, are you sawing off part of the RX-8 manifold and attaching at that point? then it could work. Oval tube would give better clearance under the cowl on tight fitting installations. Bill Schertz ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 7:01 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] intake tubing > Does everyone understand what it is I'm trying to do with this intake > tubing or am I speaking greek? I'm so tired of P.L. and his inebriated > remarks. I swear he is on a binge right now. > > Do we as a rotory community not need this type of lite weight aluminum > tubing that is perfectly matched to our ports? I thought one of the big > obstacals was our intake manifolds have things changed and I wasn't aware? > OR is everyone happy with using a Paul -Port. Which by the way talking to > Dave at Mazdatrix revealed several inconsistencies in his P-port > reporting. > > This whole thing started becasue I can't find a manifold that isn't a > chunk of extruded hunk of aluminum that weighs more than my car. > Seems easy enought to just weld four tubes of the correct size to an > aluminum plate. and that is it. We can mandral bend them have them > straight what ever. I guess I'm surprized by the groups reaction or lack > of. > > Tony > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >