Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.42; envelope-from=tonyslongez@cox.net
Message-ID: <22486185.1179964884857.JavaMail.root@fed1wml08.mgt.cox.net>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:01:24 -0700
From:  <tonyslongez@cox.net>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: intake tubing
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sensitivity: Normal

Does everyone understand what it is I'm trying to do with this intake tubing or am I speaking greek? I'm so tired of P.L. and his inebriated remarks. I swear he is on a binge right now. 
 
  Do we as a rotory community not need this type of lite weight aluminum tubing that is perfectly matched to our ports? I thought one of the big obstacals was our intake manifolds have things changed and I wasn't aware? OR is everyone happy with using a Paul -Port. Which by the way talking to Dave at Mazdatrix revealed several inconsistencies in his P-port reporting. 

This whole thing started becasue I can't find a manifold that isn't a chunk of extruded hunk of aluminum that weighs more than my car.
Seems easy enought to just weld four tubes of the correct size to an aluminum plate. and that is it. We can mandral bend them have them straight what ever. I guess I'm surprized by the groups reaction or lack of.

Tony