X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 10 [X] Return-Path: Received: from imo-m28.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.9] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2063769 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 23 May 2007 16:34:49 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.9; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-m28.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.2.) id q.d20.b9d45d6 (52836) for ; Wed, 23 May 2007 16:34:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from webmail-de09 (webmail-de09.webmail.aol.com [205.188.104.30]) by cia-m02.mx.aol.com (v115.11) with ESMTP id MAILCIAM024-ce644654a5393db; Wed, 23 May 2007 16:34:02 -0400 References: To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: Buly's frustration; different tack Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:34:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: wrjjrs@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8C96B90D54F6FBF_1758_4601_webmail-de09.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL WebMail 27379 Received: from 65.161.241.3 by webmail-de09.sysops.aol.com (205.188.104.30) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 23 May 2007 16:34:02 -0400 Message-Id: <8C96B90D54F6FBF-1758-2590@webmail-de09.sysops.aol.com> X-AOL-IP: 205.188.104.30 X-Spam-Flag: NO ----------MB_8C96B90D54F6FBF_1758_4601_webmail-de09.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Buly, =C2=A0I have an idea for you. Everything was working fine until the snubber=20= mod right? I had a thought for you. What if you had the wrong impedence inje= ctors, from the begining? It might be possible for the system to operate one= but then not when the controller internals were changed. It might have caus= ed problems with the controller in the future but you don't have a great dea= l of run time so far, so maybe there is a more fundimental problem that is s= topping you. Everyone has run through the littany of probable MINOR problems= , perhaps it's more basic. You are not a inept guy so I have trouble believe= ing that you messed up the wiring. Your work is better than that. Don't desp= air you WILL find the problem, and you'll know that the other systems are bu= lletproof!=20 =C2=A0I had a fundimental problem like this bite me once and it is frustrati= ng. My problem was caused durring the installation of a new electronic ignit= ion on a older Kawasaki Z1 900. I installed the unit bread board style with=20= the box sitting on the seat and all the leads jumpered to be sure the thing=20= would work. Ran perfectly. Installed the unit under the side cover, went to=20= start it and no joy. Turns out I had installed it on the battery box, which=20= on that older bike was rubber mounted! I had even scrapped the paint off the= spot under the mount ear for a good ground!(Took me longer to find than I w= ould like to admit) ran 1 wire direct to the battery ground and never had an= other problem. My suggestion is if the impedence suggestion is wrong conside= r this. Take everything off. Start over like it was a fresh install. I know=20= this will take some time, but you are likely to find the problem partly thro= ugh the removal anyway. It won't really take any longer than a bunch of fail= ed troubleshooting anyway. I often used this method when a problem was reall= y vexing. You might have wear through a wire bundle or a crack at a mount or= under a ziptie. Good luck. Bill Jepson ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from= AOL at AOL.com. ----------MB_8C96B90D54F6FBF_1758_4601_webmail-de09.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"


Buly,
=C2=A0I have an idea for you. Everything was working fine until the snubber=20= mod right? I had a thought for you. What if you had the wrong impedence inje= ctors, from the begining? It might be possible for the system to operate one= but then not when the controller internals were changed. It might have caus= ed problems with the controller in the future but you don't have a great dea= l of run time so far, so maybe there is a more fundimental problem that is s= topping you. Everyone has run through the littany of probable MINOR problems= , perhaps it's more basic. You are not a inept guy so I have trouble believe= ing that you messed up the wiring. Your work is better than that. Don't desp= air you WILL find the problem, and you'll know that the other systems are bu= lletproof!
=C2=A0I had a fundimental problem like this bite me once and it is frustrati= ng. My problem was caused durring the installation of a new electronic ignit= ion on a older Kawasaki Z1 900. I installed the unit bread board style with=20= the box sitting on the seat and all the leads jumpered to be sure the thing=20= would work. Ran perfectly. Installed the unit under the side cover, went to=20= start it and no joy. Turns out I had installed it on the battery box, which=20= on that older bike was rubber mounted! I had even scrapped the paint off the= spot under the mount ear for a good ground!(Took me longer to find than I w= ould like to admit) ran 1 wire direct to the battery ground and never had an= other problem. My suggestion is if the impedence suggestion is wrong conside= r this. Take everything off. Start over like it was a fresh install. I know=20= this will take some time, but you are likely to find the problem partly thro= ugh the removal anyway. It won't really take any longer than a bunch of fail= ed troubleshooting anyway. I often used this method when a problem was reall= y vexing. You might have wear through a wire bundle or a crack at a mount or= under a ziptie. Good luck.
Bill Jepson

AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from= AOL at AOL.com.
----------MB_8C96B90D54F6FBF_1758_4601_webmail-de09.sysops.aol.com--