X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Received: from smtpclma02.spirittelecom.com ([165.166.142.53] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTPS id 2050759 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 17 May 2007 23:17:13 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=165.166.142.53; envelope-from=jewen@comporium.net Received: from webmail2.comporium.net (webmailrh04.infoave.net [165.166.0.86]) by smtpclma02.spirittelecom.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l4I3GZZj023333 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 03:16:36 GMT Received: from 165.166.0.80 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jewen) by webmail2.comporium.net with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2007 23:16:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <50069.165.166.0.80.1179458178.squirrel@webmail2.comporium.net> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 23:16:18 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Interesting tid bits From: jewen@comporium.net To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@spirittelecom.com X-Provider: WebMail2 X-Provider-URI: http://www.spirittelecom.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/3267/Thu May 17 20:40:58 2007 on smtpclma02.spirittelecom.com X-Virus-Status: Clean IMO AI (artificial inelegance) is the latest fad among consultants and top manufacturing executives. Remember 'synergy', a company had to be synergistic with the right mission statement to be effective and competitive. Not wanting to knock a profession, but I can not say I have seen too many consultants that have actually made a company more profitable. Many of their pitches sound good, but many do not have the ability for practical application (kind of like those who can't ... teach.) This is just my experience. I had a meeting this week with some of our corporate executives to pitch standardizing control platforms, data acquisition in our main plant. I presented concepts of real time process, productivity and yield monitoring of course I was asked if AI could be used. When examples of AI were given it was apparent that the term AI was being used where the term Automation has been used for the last couple of decades. So it looks like we are moving to use the term AI, rather than automation. After all isn't AI more impressive. In my aircraft installation, I may use the term automation because I have built in a P4 computer. An example of what I refer to as automation is monitoring temperatures, pressures, flight data, etc. If a parameter exceeds a predefined limit, an alarm is issued. IMO this can be helpful to see problems earlier - an example might be an alternator failure, by monitor the bus voltage, I might see the failure before my radios (or worse EC2) goes dead. IMO, while true AI (ability to make cognitive decisions and self learning) is being experimented with in industry, it still remains primarily a tool for SciFi writers. At the end of the day AI is one of the latest fad terms and we experimental AC builders still need to practice saying 'Pilot In Command.' I will call it a night by saying "This is just one man's (hopefully humble) option" Joe On Thu, May 17, 2007 9:54 pm, John Downing wrote: > Joe, being a Northern Michigan Farmer, ones sees some interesting items > posted here IMHO. One being artificial intelligence in cockpit!. What > the H#@* is that supposed to mean? JohnD